Redundant Wheel Drive Control for Vehicle Emergency Operation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hybrid and battery-electric vehicles with damaged drive systems, such as combustion engines, electric motors, transmissions, or high-voltage batteries, cannot continue driving and are at risk of becoming stranded, posing safety hazards and incurring significant towing costs, as existing systems lack reliable emergency operation capabilities.

Innovation Solution

An electric traction drive with independently controllable single-wheel drives on each axle, featuring a common energy source and separate control and power networks for each wheel, including a redundant data bus interface and an emergency energy source, allowing for emergency operation even if one drive is faulty, enabling the vehicle to limp to safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single centralized control system is used for wheel hub drives, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates because a single fault can deactivate both drives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidemergency operation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into two independently controllable wheel hub drives, each with its own control unit and data bus interface. This segmentation ensures that a fault in one drive does not affect the other, enabling emergency operation with at least one functional drive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates redundant data bus interfaces and separate control networks as a form of prior cushioning against potential failures. This redundancy is built into the system design beforehand, allowing the vehicle to maintain operational capability even when one control path fails.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Reliability

If redundant control networks are implemented for emergency operation, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemergency operation capabilityVSAvoidcontrol network complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control network is divided into two separate, independent data bus interfaces, each dedicated to controlling one wheel hub drive. This segmentation provides redundancy without requiring a fully duplicated complex system, as each interface is simpler and more manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each wheel hub drive has its own localized control unit and data bus interface, tailored to its specific function. This local quality approach allows each subsystem to be optimized independently, reducing overall complexity while maintaining reliability through redundancy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP3325307B1Electrical traction drive for a vehicle
Publication Date: 2022.11.02 ZIEHL ABEGG AUTOMOTIVE GMBH & CO KG
  • EP3325307B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3325307B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3325307B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

In an electrical traction drive for a vehicle, comprising at least two individual wheel drives that are to be controlled independently of each other, the drives are able to be operated redundantly in order for an emergency operating function to be implemented.