Reed Baling and Stacking Automation for Labor-Intensive Harvesting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mechanical harvesting of reeds in wetlands is inefficient, labor-intensive, and requires multiple workers, with manual handling of baled reeds leading to unsafe working conditions and low production efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A reed baling and stacking device with a knotter, feed box, stacking mechanism, and control unit that automates the process of knotting reeds into small bales, stacking them vertically or horizontally, and forming a big bale, using mechanical clamps and wire clamps driven by a control unit.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual harvesting is used, then labor flexibility is maintained, but production efficiency is low and labor intensity is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting efficiencyVSAvoidlabor intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service through automated operations: the knotter automatically knots reeds into bales, the stacking mechanism automatically stacks bales in the feed box, and the unloading mechanism automatically unloads completed big bales. This eliminates the need for manual handling and significantly reduces labor intensity while maintaining continuous harvesting operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical operations are replaced with automated mechanical systems: manual knotting is replaced by an automated knotter, manual stacking is replaced by a mechanically-driven stacking mechanism with clamps, and manual unloading is replaced by an automated unloading mechanism. This substitution dramatically improves productivity while reducing the need for human labor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If multiple workers are deployed for conveyance and stacking, then harvesting capacity is maintained, but labor cost and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting capacityVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system ensures continuity of useful action through integrated automated operations: the knotter continuously knots reeds as they are harvested, the stacking mechanism continuously stacks bales without interruption, and the unloading mechanism continuously unloads completed bales. This eliminates idle time and waiting periods associated with manual operations, maintaining maximum harvesting capacity throughout the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple separate operations (knotting, conveying, stacking, and unloading) are merged into a single integrated automated system. The knotter, stacking mechanism, and unloading mechanism work together as one coordinated unit, eliminating the need for separate workers for each operation and reducing overall time consumption while maintaining harvesting capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If manual handling of baled reeds is performed, then operational simplicity is maintained, but working safety is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworking safetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts workers from the hazardous stacking and unloading operations, removing them from the working environment entirely. The stacking mechanism and unloading mechanism perform these dangerous tasks automatically, eliminating exposure to potential safety hazards while the added mechanical complexity is justified by the safety improvements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Productivity

If feed box is filled manually, then operational flexibility is maintained, but labor efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabor efficiencyVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The stacking mechanism provides self-service by automatically stacking bales into the feed box without human intervention. The clamps automatically grasp bles, position them correctly, and release them in the feed box, eliminating manual labor while improving labor efficiency. The added mechanical complexity is offset by the significant reduction in labor requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250255219A1Reed baling and stacking device, method, and harvester
Publication Date: 2025.08.14 JIANGSU UNIV
  • US20250255219A1 patent drawing
  • US20250255219A1 patent drawing
  • US20250255219A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a reed baling and stacking device, a method, and a harvester. The reed baling and stacking device includes a knotter, a feed box, a stacking mechanism, and a control unit, where the stacking mechanism is located between the knotter and the feed box; the knotter is configured to knot reeds into small bales; the stacking mechanism is configured to stack the small bales of reeds to the feed box vertically or horizontally; the feed box is configured to knot the small bales of reeds into a big bale; and the control unit is connected to the feed box and the stacking mechanism. According to the present disclosure, the reeds are knotted into the small bales, the small bales are stacked to the feed box vertically or horizontally, the small bales of reeds are knotted into the big bale, and the big bale is unloaded mechanically.