Long-Term Reference Frame Retention for Video Compression Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current video compression standards like H.264 and H.265 incur efficiency losses when scenes with static backgrounds change, as updating entire long-term reference frames is costly and inefficient, leading to repeated encoding of previously discarded frames.

Innovation Solution

Implementing extended long-term reference (eLTR) frames with adjustable retention times, allowing selective retention and update of frames based on usage patterns, either in real-time (online) or offline, to optimize memory usage and compression efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If entire long-term reference frames are updated when scene changes occur, then compression efficiency is maintained, but processing cost and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the long-term reference frame into multiple versions (e.g., LTR frame 102, LTR frame 104, LTR frame 106) and selectively updates only the portions that have changed (such as updating LTR frame 104 to 106) rather than replacing the entire frame. This segmentation allows the system to maintain compression efficiency while reducing processing time by avoiding unnecessary updates of unchanged regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by updating only specific portions of the long-term reference frame that have changed (e.g., updating LTR frame 104 to 106) while retaining unchanged portions (LTR frame 102). This selective updating approach maintains compression efficiency for changed regions while avoiding the time cost of processing the entire frame.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If entire long-term reference frames are updated when scene changes occur, then compression efficiency is maintained, but data transmission cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression efficiencyVSAvoiddata transmission cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the changed portions of the long-term reference frame (e.g., updating LTR frame 104 to 106) and transmits only these differences rather than the entire frame. This extraction approach maintains compression efficiency for the changed regions while significantly reducing data transmission cost by excluding unchanged portions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by updating only specific portions of the long-term reference frame that have changed (e.g., updating LTR frame 104 to 106) while retaining unchanged portions (LTR frame 102). This selective updating approach maintains compression efficiency for changed regions while avoiding the time cost of processing the entire frame.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If prior long-term reference frames are discarded when updated, then processing is simplified, but compression efficiency decreases when scenes repeat

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing simplicityVSAvoidcompression efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the long-term reference frame into multiple versions (e.g., LTR frame 102, LTR frame 104, LTR frame 106) and maintains all versions in the reference picture buffer. This segmentation allows the system to retain previous frames (LTR frame 102, LTR frame 104) even after updating (LTR frame 106), enabling efficient compression when scenes repeat without increasing processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by maintaining multiple versions of long-term reference frames in the reference picture buffer before they are fully discarded. This allows the system to retain useful information from previous frames (LTR frame 102, LTR frame 104) for future reference, improving compression efficiency when scenes repeat without requiring complex processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If extended long-term reference frames with adjustable retention times are implemented, then compression efficiency and error-resilience are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by implementing adjustable retention times for different long-term reference frames (e.g., LTR frame 102, LTR frame 104, LTR frame 106) based on their importance and usage patterns. This dynamic approach allows the system to adaptively manage reference frames, improving compression efficiency and error-resilience while controlling complexity through parameter adjustment rather than structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20260059101A1Online and offline selection of extended long term reference picture retention
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 DOLBY INTERNATIONAL AB
  • US20260059101A1 patent drawing
  • US20260059101A1 patent drawing
  • US20260059101A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An video signal processor includes circuitry configured to receive a video, determine a plurality of long-term reference frames, determine a long-term reference retention time, and encode the video into a bitstream including the determined plurality of long-term reference fames and the determined retention time. A decoded picture buffer for retaining a plurality of reconstructed pictures, including a long term reference picture, is also provided.