Centralized Reference Laboratory Network for Code Update Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current clinical reference laboratory testing processes are inefficient and error-prone due to manual handling of specimen requests and result reporting, lack of centralized mapping, and frequent code changes by reference laboratories, leading to difficulties in determining appropriate laboratories and maintaining accurate interfaces.

Innovation Solution

A centralized reference laboratory network that facilitates communication between physician offices and laboratories through a computer system with a processor and software components for mapping procedures, managing updates, and modifying laboratory connections, including graphical user interfaces for searching, ordering, and updating procedures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual processes are used for requesting and reporting reference laboratory testing, then flexibility in handling diverse laboratory interfaces is maintained, but the process becomes tedious, inefficient, and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of requesting and reporting testingVSAvoidaccuracy of testing requests and results
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system that acts as a mediator between healthcare providers and reference laboratories. This system receives testing requests, automatically determines appropriate laboratories based on maintained information about testing capabilities and insurance acceptance, and facilitates result reporting. The intermediary eliminates manual review processes while ensuring accurate matching of patients with appropriate laboratories, thereby improving both ease of operation and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If individual interfaces are required for each reference laboratory, then specific laboratory requirements can be met, but the complexity of maintaining alias maps increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to interface with different laboratoriesVSAvoidcomplexity of maintaining alias maps
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal interface system that can communicate with multiple different reference laboratories through a single standardized approach. The system maintains centralized information about various laboratories' testing capabilities and uses this information to automatically route requests appropriately. This universal interface eliminates the need for maintaining separate alias maps for each laboratory, reducing complexity while preserving the ability to adapt to different laboratory requirements through centralized configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If reference laboratories frequently change codes associated with tests, then testing accuracy can be improved, but the effort to maintain accurate alias maps increases time and cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of test codingVSAvoidtime to maintain alias maps
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the system automatically receives and processes code change notifications from reference laboratories. When code changes occur, the system is notified and automatically updates its internal mappings and alias maps. This feedback loop ensures that the system maintains accurate test coding information without requiring manual intervention, thereby preserving measurement precision while eliminating the time loss associated with manual map maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Ease of operation

If results reporting is done through manual processes such as mailing, faxing, emailing, or phoning, then flexibility in communication methods is maintained, but opportunities for miscommunication increase and timeliness decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in reporting methodsVSAvoidaccuracy of results communication
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical reporting processes (mailing, faxing, emailing, phoning) with an automated electronic system. The intermediary system electronically transmits test results directly from reference laboratories to healthcare providers through standardized interfaces. This substitution eliminates human error in transcription and communication while maintaining flexibility through automated routing based on the centralized information about appropriate recipients and methods, thereby improving both accuracy and timeliness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10970677B2Managing updates from reference laboratories
Publication Date: 2021.04.06 CERNER INNOVATION INC
  • US10970677B2 patent drawing
  • US10970677B2 patent drawing
  • US10970677B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Computerized systems, methods, and graphical user interfaces are provided to facilitate communication between physician offices and reference laboratories. A reference laboratory content manager provides a centralized conduit for interfacing clients placing orders for reference laboratory testing and reference laboratories performing testing. The reference laboratory content manager leverages centralized mapping across organizations by managing associations for procedures between reference laboratory aliases and client aliases. The centralized mapping enables the reference laboratory content manager to manage updates from reference laboratories and facilitate clients wishing to modify utilization of reference laboratories.