Refill Station Segmentation for Carbonation Container CO2 Supply

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing refill systems for carbonation containers lack a convenient and efficient method for refilling pressurized CO2, limiting the number of refills and user control over the refilling process.

Innovation Solution

A refill station with a pressurized CO2 tank and a controllable refill valve, integrated with a control interface and conduit, allowing users to refill carbonation containers multiple times by user input, ensuring sufficient CO2 supply for at least three instances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a refill system uses a small portable CO2 tank, then the device is portable and easy to operate, but the tank can only support limited refills (less than three times)

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveportabilityVSAvoidCO2 supply capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the CO2 storage into two separate components: a large stationary refill tank and a small portable container tank. The stationary tank serves as the bulk storage reservoir, while the portable tank provides mobility and direct carbonation function. This segmentation allows the portable unit to remain lightweight and easy to operate while the stationary unit provides sufficient CO2 supply capacity for multiple refills.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If a refill system uses a large CO2 tank to support multiple refills, then the CO2 supply capacity is sufficient, but the device becomes bulky and less portable

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO2 supply capacityVSAvoidportability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates the large CO2 storage function into a stationary refill tank, while the portable container tank maintains its small size for ease of operation. The stationary tank handles the bulk storage requirement, allowing the portable unit to remain compact and maneuverable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If the refill process is automated without user control, then the refilling speed is faster, but the user cannot control the refilling process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverefilling speedVSAvoiduser control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs an automated valve mechanism that self-regulates the refilling process based on pressure differential. When the portable container tank's pressure is lower than the stationary refill tank's pressure, CO2 automatically flows through the valve to equalize pressures. This eliminates the need for manual operation while maintaining user control through the automatic pressure-balancing mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If the refill system requires manual intervention for each refill, then the user has full control, but the refilling process is time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser controlVSAvoidrefilling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated pressure-balancing valve performs the refilling operation autonomously by detecting pressure differences between tanks. The user simply connects the portable container tank to the stationary refill tank, and the system automatically transfers CO2 until pressure equalization occurs, significantly improving refilling efficiency while maintaining simplicity and user oversight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient and user-controlled refilling of carbonation containers, providing multiple refills without the need for frequent CO2 replenishment, enhancing convenience and portability.

Implementation Method 1

The refill tank may be configured to hold a pressurized liquid, such as CO2... The second volume of the refill tank holds an amount of the pressurized liquid that is sufficient to support at least three separate and distinct instances of refilling the container tank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

controlling transfer, by a controllable refill valve included in the refill station, of the pressurized liquid from the refill tank to the container tank. Operation of the controllable refill valve is based at least in part on the user input received through the control interface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectValve control: Valve

Data Source

PatentUS11840439B1Refill station for refillable carbonation container
Publication Date: 2023.12.12 MAVORCO OPERATIONS LLC
  • US11840439B1 patent drawing
  • US11840439B1 patent drawing
  • US11840439B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A refill station for refillable carbonation containers is disclosed. Exemplary implementations may include a refill station housing, a refill tank, a control interface, a conduit, a controllable refill valve, and/or other components. The refill tank of the refill station holds a pressurized liquid, such as CO2. The refill station housing holds a carbonation container, such as a bottle, which includes a container tank. A user can control filling or refilling the container tank from the refill tank.