Refinement Models for Adapting Fixed-Parameter Language Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Generative language models with fixed parameters are not tunable by end users, limiting their utility to specific task domains, despite their capability to learn complex tasks with extensive training.

Innovation Solution

Employ a refinement model with tunable parameters to refine actions generated by a first machine learning model with fixed parameters, using a reward model to select between actions, and employ reinforcement learning with human/machine feedback to train the refinement model.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a generative language model with fixed parameters is used, then the model can generate natural language text with high capability, but the model cannot be tuned by end users for specific task domains

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetunability for specific task domainsVSAvoidmodel parameter accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the model functionality into two distinct components: a fixed-parameter generative language model and a separate refinement model with tunable parameters. This segmentation allows the refinement model to be independently trained and adapted to specific task domains without modifying the original model, thereby resolving the contradiction between model capability and tunability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The refinement model acts as an intermediary between the fixed-parameter generative language model and the specific task domain requirements. It receives outputs from the first model, refines them based on domain-specific training, and produces final outputs tailored to the target domain, thus enabling adaptability without direct parameter access to the original model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a refinement model with tunable parameters is introduced, then the model can be adapted to specific task domains, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to task domainsVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into modular components: the original generative language model, the refinement model, and the reinforcement learning training pipeline. This modular segmentation allows each component to be developed, trained, and maintained independently, managing system complexity while achieving adaptability through the refinement model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The refinement model serves multiple functions: it adapts the generative language model to different task domains, refines model outputs, and can be retrained for new domains. This multi-functionality justifies the added system complexity by providing versatile adaptability across various applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If reinforcement learning with human feedback is used to train the refinement model, then the model can learn to select better actions, but the training process requires additional computational resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaction selection qualityVSAvoidcomputational resources for training
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of applying reinforcement learning to the entire generative language model, the approach applies it only to the smaller refinement model. This partial action reduces the computational burden significantly while still achieving reliable action selection, as the refinement model only needs to learn to select or modify outputs from the first model rather than generating all outputs from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The refinement model learns from copied training data and feedback signals generated during the reinforcement learning process. By using simulated feedback and trained reward models, the system reduces the need for extensive human feedback during training, thereby lowering computational requirements while maintaining action selection quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20250265471A1Reinforcement learning for refinement models
Publication Date: 2025.08.21 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US20250265471A1 patent drawing
  • US20250265471A1 patent drawing
  • US20250265471A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosed concepts relate to employing a refinement model to refine actions generated by a first machine learning model. In some cases, the first machine learning model can have fixed parameters that are not readily available to be tuned for a new task domain. To overcome this issue, a refinement model can be employed to refine actions output by the first machine learning model. Then, a reward model can be employed to select either first actions output by the first machine learning model or refined actions output by the refinement model.