Refining Used Electrical Insulating Oils via Vacuum Degassing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for refining used electrical insulating oils fail to produce naphthenic base oils that meet the quality standards for new insulating oils due to issues with oxidative stability and corrosivity, requiring additional processing steps to address volatile and semi-volatile sulphur compounds and other contaminants.

Innovation Solution

A method involving exposing the feed oil to reducing conditions at elevated temperature and pressure, followed by degassing under reduced pressure to prevent oxidation, and extracting the oil with water to produce a refined oil that meets industry standards for transformer oils without further refining.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If used electrical insulating oils are refined through conventional methods, then some contaminants are removed, but the product fails to meet quality standards for new insulating oils due to remaining volatile and semi-volatile sulphur compounds and poor oxidative stability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of refined oilVSAvoidoxidative stability and corrosivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by conducting a degassing step under reduced pressure before exposing the oil to oxidizing conditions. This preliminary removal of volatile and semi-volatile sulphur compounds prevents subsequent oxidation reactions that would compromise oxidative stability. The sequence is critical: degassing first, then optional oxidation for contaminant removal, ensuring harmful factors are eliminated before they can generate stability issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by controlling pressure conditions throughout the process. Reduced pressure is applied during degassing to selectively remove volatile contaminants without causing excessive heating or oxidation. Pressure is then increased when handling the refined oil to prevent re-absorption of volatile compounds. These pressure parameter changes enable selective removal of harmful sulphur compounds while preserving oxidative stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If additional processing steps are added to address volatile sulphur compounds and oxidative stability, then quality standards are met, but process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of refined oilVSAvoidnumber of processing steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple functions into a single integrated refining process. The hydroprocessing reactor simultaneously performs hydrogenation of aromatic compounds, removal of sulphur compounds through degassing under reduced pressure, and neutralization of acidic contaminants using basic nitrogen compounds. This consolidation achieves comprehensive contaminant removal and oxidative stability improvement without requiring separate processing units for each function, thereby reducing overall process complexity while maintaining high product quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The refining process exhibits multi-functionality by using a single hydroprocessing system that performs multiple contaminant removal tasks. The basic nitrogen containing compound serves dual purposes: neutralizing acid sites on catalysts and neutralizing acidic contaminants in the oil. The degassing step under reduced pressure simultaneously removes volatile sulphur compounds and prevents oxidation. This universal approach handles diverse contaminant types through unified process steps rather than dedicated units for each contaminant class.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process effectively reduces contaminants and improves the quality of the refined oil, achieving low volatile and halogen content, low corrosivity, and meeting industry standards for transformer oils, thereby simplifying the production of new naphthenic base oils from used electrical insulating oils.

Implementation Method 1

exposing the feed oil to reducing conditions at elevated temperature and pressure so as to reduce at least some of the contaminants

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogenation: Hydrogenation

Implementation Method 2

reducing conditions at elevated temperature and pressure so as to reduce at least some of the contaminants

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reduction: Reduction

Implementation Method 3

degassing the resulting oil under reduced pressure before the oil is exposed to any relatively more oxidizing conditions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum degassing: Vacuum Distillation

Implementation Method 4

extracting the resulting oil with water so as to produce a refined oil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLiquid-liquid extraction: Liquid-Liquid Extraction

Data Source

PatentUS9828558B2Refining of used oils
Publication Date: 2017.11.28 GREENBOTTLE RE-REFINING (UK) LTD
  • US9828558B2 patent drawing
  • US9828558B2 patent drawing
  • US9828558B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for refining a feed oil having contaminants therein. In the method, the feed oil is exposed to reducing conditions at elevated temperature and pressure so as to reduce at least some of said contaminants. The resulting oil is then degassed under reduced pressure under non-oxidizing conditions and the resulting oil extracted with water so as to produce a refined oil.