Reflective Memory Bridge for OLTP Data Replication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Database systems face challenges with data contention and metadata contention in online transaction processing (OLTP) systems, particularly as the number of parallel transactions increases, leading to higher transaction response times.

Innovation Solution

Employing reflective memory in a multi-node computing and database environment, where a reflective memory bridge maps incoming and outgoing memory regions across computing nodes, maintaining k-safety without requiring I/O operations, and reducing lock and latch contention by transmitting changes immediately rather than buffering them.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional buffering mechanisms are used for data replication, then reliability is improved through k-safety, but device complexity and communication latency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvek-safetyVSAvoidbuffer construction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the buffering mechanism from the data replication process. Instead of buffering data locally and then replicating it, the system uses reflective memory to directly replicate data changes to remote nodes without requiring local buffering. This eliminates the complexity of buffer management while maintaining k-safety through immediate reflection of data changes to multiple nodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The reflective memory acts as an intermediary between data writes and replication. Rather than the writing node buffering data and then replicating it, the reflective memory directly reflects changes to remote nodes. This intermediary mechanism simplifies the overall system architecture by eliminating the need for complex buffer coordination while ensuring reliable replication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If data is replicated to multiple nodes for k-safety, then reliability is improved, but transaction response time increases due to data contention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvek-safetyVSAvoidtransaction response time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The reflective memory performs preliminary actions by immediately reflecting data changes to remote nodes as they occur, rather than waiting for buffering or replication cycles to complete. This preliminary reflection of data changes to multiple nodes ensures that replication is happening concurrently with data access operations, reducing transaction response time while maintaining k-safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The reflective memory enables continuous data replication without interruption. Instead of buffering data and then replicating it in batches, the system continuously reflects data changes to remote nodes in real-time. This continuous action eliminates idle waiting periods and reduces transaction response time while ensuring all nodes are updated for k-safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Productivity

If horizontal partitioning is used for scaling, then productivity is improved, but data contention and metadata contention increase with more parallel transactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescaling capabilityVSAvoiddata contention
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The reflective memory creates copies of data changes and distributes them to multiple remote nodes simultaneously. Instead of sequential replication, the system copies data changes to multiple nodes in parallel, reducing contention. This copying mechanism allows multiple nodes to have consistent data without requiring sequential updates, thereby reducing data contention while maintaining scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments data into different memory regions that can be independently accessed by different nodes. The reflective memory manages these segments by reflecting changes to specific regions of remote nodes, reducing metadata contention. This segmentation allows parallel transactions to access different data regions simultaneously without interfering with each other, maintaining scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10762011B2Reflective memory bridge for external computing nodes
Publication Date: 2020.09.01 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US10762011B2 patent drawing
  • US10762011B2 patent drawing
  • US10762011B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In at least some examples, a computing node includes a processor and a local memory coupled to the processor. The computing node also includes a reflective memory bridge coupled to the processor. The reflective memory bridge maps to an incoming region of the local memory assigned to at least one external computing node and maps to an outgoing region of the local memory assigned to at least one external computing node.