Reflective Mount Verification for In-Vehicle Exterior Lights

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for verifying vehicle exterior light functionality are cumbersome, time-consuming, and often impractical, especially for commercial drivers, and existing electronic systems are costly and unreliable.

Innovation Solution

A reflective mount system with strategically positioned reflective surfaces in parking areas allows vehicle operators to visually confirm light functionality without exiting the vehicle, using highly polished materials like polished aluminum or mirrored glass to provide clear reflections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional manual inspection methods are used, then the operator can verify light functionality, but the process is time-consuming and requires the operator to exit the vehicle

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight functionality verificationVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary optical system consisting of reflective surfaces (mirrors) positioned at strategic angles to redirect light from vehicle fixtures to the operator's viewing position. This intermediary allows the operator to verify light functionality without exiting the vehicle, resolving the contradiction between reliable verification and time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses optical reflection to create a virtual viewing dimension, allowing the operator to see light fixtures from positions that would otherwise require physical movement. By introducing reflective surfaces at specific angles (e.g., 45 degrees), the system projects light images to the operator's seat, eliminating the need to exit the vehicle while maintaining verification reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Extent of automation

If electronic monitoring systems with current sensors are used, then automation is improved, but the system cannot confirm actual light illumination and adds cost and complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight verification automationVSAvoidlight illumination confirmation
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces electronic current sensors with an optical verification system using reflective surfaces. Instead of detecting electrical current, the system directly observes light illumination through strategically positioned mirrors, providing reliable visual confirmation of actual light output without the cost and complexity of electronic monitoring equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates optical copies (reflections) of the light fixtures using mirrored surfaces. These reflections provide a visual replica of the actual light output, allowing the operator to verify illumination without directly viewing the physical light source. This optical copying approach is simpler and more reliable than electronic sensing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If the operator exits the vehicle to inspect lights, then direct visual inspection is possible, but the process becomes physically demanding and impractical in adverse weather

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisual inspection accuracyVSAvoidinspection convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces reflective surfaces as intermediaries that redirect light from fixtures to the operator's viewing position inside the vehicle. This intermediary system maintains visual inspection accuracy by providing clear reflected images of the light output, while eliminating the need for the operator to exit the vehicle, thereby improving ease of operation in all weather conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of manufacture

If simple visual inspection methods are used, then cost is reduced, but the operator must physically access each light fixture

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem costVSAvoidlight verification convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses simple reflective surfaces (mirrors) as intermediaries to redirect light from fixtures to the operator's viewing position. These mirrors can be made from inexpensive materials such as polished aluminum, stainless steel, or even reflective tape, maintaining low system cost while dramatically improving operational convenience by eliminating the need to physically access each light fixture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient and reliable verification of exterior vehicle fixtures from within the driver's seat, reducing time and cost while ensuring compliance with safety and regulatory standards.

Implementation Method 1

The reflective pane can be positioned at an angle of 30° to 60° relative to the mounting surface... using highly polished materials like polished aluminum or mirrored glass to provide clear reflections

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS20250297916A1Reflective vehicle warning fixture verification device and system
Publication Date: 2025.09.25 THIRD EYE TECHNOLOGY
  • US20250297916A1 patent drawing
  • US20250297916A1 patent drawing
  • US20250297916A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein is a reflective mount made from a single continuous material, featuring a reflective pane connected to at least one mounting surface. The reflective pane can be positioned at an angle of 30° to 60° relative to the mounting surface and may include an angling bridge oriented between 0° and 90° to the mounting surface. The design can incorporate one or more raised panes protruding from the reflective pane, each positioned at an angle of 10° to 50° relative to the reflective pane. A reflective material may be affixed to the reflective pane alone, to each raised pane, or to both the reflective and raised panes. This reflective mount can be incorporated into a verification system.