Refractory Metal Core Composite for Turbine Blade Complexity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional manufacturing techniques, such as investment casting and TOMO photolithography, face limitations in producing complex features due to the fragility of ceramic and refractory metal cores, which restrict the complexity and applicability of fabricated components in gas turbine engines and other applications.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the use of refractory metal cores (RMCs) fabricated through techniques like stamping, laser cutting, or additive manufacturing, combined with a ceramic slurry and binder, to create composite bodies that can be sintered and used to form complex features in components, such as turbine blades, by encapsulating the RMCs within a tool and injecting a slurry that hardens around them, allowing for the creation of multiwall components with enhanced strength and design freedom.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If ceramic cores are used in investment casting, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but the complexity of features that can be fabricated is limited due to fragility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature complexityVSAvoidcore fragility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining refractory metal cores with ceramic materials. The refractory metal core provides the necessary strength and ductility to fabricate complex features, while the ceramic material maintains the manufacturing simplicity and high-temperature resistance of traditional investment casting. This composite approach resolves the contradiction by allowing complex geometries to be achieved without sacrificing core reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Device complexity

If refractory metal cores are used to enable complex features, then feature complexity increases, but manufacturing cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature complexityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The composite structure allows the use of refractory metal only for the core portion requiring strength and complexity, while the surrounding ceramic material provides the bulk structural function at lower cost. This selective application of expensive materials only where necessary reduces overall manufacturing cost while maintaining the ability to fabricate complex features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The core is segmented into refractory metal regions for complex features and ceramic regions for simpler structural portions. This segmentation allows optimization of material usage, applying expensive refractory metal only where complex geometry is required rather than throughout the entire core structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Strength

If traditional ceramic cores are used, then manufacturing process simplicity is maintained, but the strength and robustness of the core is insufficient for complex geometries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecore strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The composite core structure combines refractory metal's high strength and ductility with ceramic's manufacturing simplicity. The refractory metal core can be formed using conventional stamping or additive manufacturing techniques, maintaining process simplicity while achieving the strength necessary for complex geometries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the fabrication of components with intricate three-dimensional features, providing enhanced cooling and weight savings, and overcoming the fragility limitations of traditional methods by producing robust, complex geometries that were previously unattainable.

Implementation Method 1

the composite body is sintered to generate a sintered composite body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Implementation Method 2

a binder material to attach to the refractory metal core

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical Bonding: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentEP3431207B1Linkage of composite core features
Publication Date: 2022.03.16 RTX CORP
  • EP3431207B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3431207B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3431207B1 patent drawingFigure 2A

AI summary

Aspects of the disclosure are directed to a method comprising obtaining a refractory metal core (RMC), installing the RMC inside a tool, and subsequent to installing the RMC inside the tool, injecting a slurry into the tool to form a composite body from the RMC and the slurry. Aspects of the disclosure are directed to a composite body, comprising: a refractory metal core (RMC), and a slurry that at least partially encapsulates the RMC.