Refractory Metal Interlayer Shields TCO from Plasma Damage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Thin-film solar cells based on hydrogenated amorphous silicon face challenges due to plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) affecting substrate materials, leading to defects and increased recombination of light-generated charge carriers at the transparent front contact.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a very thin layer of a refractory metal, such as molybdenum, tungsten, or tantalum, as an interlayer between the transparent conductive oxide (TCO) contact layer and the hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) layer in the solar cell structure to act as a barrier against plasma aggression and enhance light transmission and capture.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a transparent conductive oxide layer (TCO) is used as front contact, then light transmission is maintained, but plasma aggression during PECVD deposition causes defects and increased carrier recombination at the TCO/a-Si:H interface

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface qualityVSAvoidplasma damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A thin refractory metal interlayer (5-20 nm) is introduced between the TCO and a-Si:H layers to act as a protective intermediary. This interlayer shields the TCO from plasma aggression during PECVD deposition, preventing interface defects and reducing carrier recombination, while maintaining the overall functionality of the front contact structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The refractory metal interlayer is deposited on the TCO surface before the a-Si:H layer deposition. This preliminary protective layer is in place before plasma exposure occurs, preventing plasma damage to the TCO/a-Si:H interface from the outset

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If a refractory metal layer is added as interlayer, then plasma resistance and interface protection are improved, but device structure complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplasma resistanceVSAvoidcontact structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The refractory metal interlayer is used with precisely controlled thickness parameters (5-20 nm). This parameter optimization ensures sufficient plasma protection while maintaining adequate light transmission and electrical conductivity, balancing protection benefits against structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the refractory metal layer thickness is increased to improve plasma barrier, then plasma protection is enhanced, but light transmission decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplasma barrier effectivenessVSAvoidlight transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The thickness of the refractory metal interlayer is optimized within the 5-20 nm range. This parameter selection provides sufficient plasma barrier effectiveness while maintaining high light transmission, as thicker layers would excessively attenuate light and thinner layers would insufficiently protect against plasma

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves the energy conversion efficiency by reducing carrier recombination, increasing open-circuit voltage, and maintaining high light transmittance, effectively addressing the defects caused by plasma exposure during the deposition process.

Implementation Method 1

the ability of a refractory metal to withstand plasma aggression and possibly shield a more delicate TCO surface layer during the deposition of the hydrogenated amorphous silicon thin film

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma: Plasma

Implementation Method 2

plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition fabrication technique of hydrogenated amorphous silicon

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition: Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapour Deposition

Implementation Method 3

the transparency of such refractory metal barrier to the light

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight transmission: Light

Implementation Method 4

The presence of a thin metal layer at the contact interface triggers the excitation of surface plasma polaritons (SPPs), the effects of which in improving light transmission and light capture in the absorption silicon layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface plasma polaritons: Plasma

Data Source

PatentUS10103281B2Thin refractory metal layer used as contact barrier to improve the performance of thin-film solar cells
Publication Date: 2018.10.16 STMICROELECTRONICS SRL
  • US10103281B2 patent drawing
  • US10103281B2 patent drawing
  • US10103281B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A thin film amorphous silicon solar cell may have front contact between a hydrogenated amorphous silicon layer and a transparent conductive oxide layer. The cell may include a layer of a refractory metal, chosen among the group composed of molybdenum, tungsten, tantalum and titanium, of thickness adapted to ensure a light transmittance of at least 80%, interposed therebetween, before growing by PECVD a hydrogenated amorphous silicon p-i-n light absorption layer over it. A refractory metal layer of just about 1 nm thickness may effectively shield the oxide from the reactive plasma, thereby preventing a diffused defect when forming the p.i.n. layer that would favor recombination of light-generated charge carriers.