Refractory Metal Powder Morphology for Lower-Energy 3D Printing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The high melting temperatures and unusual strength of refractory metals like tungsten make them difficult to process into suitable powders for additive manufacturing, requiring high energy-intensive methods that are costly and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A non-spherical refractory metal powder with specific grain size distribution and mechanical treatment processes, such as ball or jet milling, produces powders suitable for additive manufacturing without the need for high-energy melting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If high-energy melting and nozzle-jetting methods are used to produce spherical metal powder, then sphericity and flowability are improved, but energy consumption and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesphericityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the particle morphology parameter from spherical to non-spherical (elongated/cylindrical shapes with aspect ratios of 1.1-2.0), eliminating the need for high-energy melting processes while achieving satisfactory flowability and packing characteristics for additive manufacturing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces thermal/chemical processing (melting and nozzle-jetting) with mechanical processing methods to produce elongated particles, thereby substituting high-energy thermal systems with lower-energy mechanical systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Shape

If high-energy melting methods are used to produce refractory metal powder, then suitable powder morphology is achieved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle morphologyVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the target particle morphology from spherical to elongated/cylindrical shapes, which can be produced through lower-cost mechanical processing methods rather than expensive melting and jetting processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses readily available refractory metal powders (tungsten, molybdenum, vanadium, chromium) as starting materials and applies simple mechanical processing, replacing expensive specialized manufacturing processes with more economical methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of operation

If conventional spherical powder production methods are used, then flowability is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflowabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention optimizes particle aspect ratio to 1.1-2.0 and controls grain size distribution (D10: 10-100 μm, D90: 100-500 μm) to achieve adequate flowability without requiring spherical shapes, thereby eliminating high-energy melting processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention achieves sufficient (but not perfect) flowability through controlled elongation rather than complete spheroidization, using partial mechanical processing instead of excessive energy-intensive melting to produce particles with adequate functional properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process achieves refractory metal powders with suitable flowability, bulk and tap densities, and low oxygen content, reducing energy consumption and manufacturing costs while maintaining performance in additive manufacturing processes.

Implementation Method 1

mechanical treatment processes, such as ball or jet milling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS20260034582A1Refractory Metal Powder for Additive Manufacturing and Method for the Production Thereof
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 H C STARCK GMBH
  • US20260034582A1 patent drawing
  • US20260034582A1 patent drawing
  • US20260034582A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a refractory metal powder for additive manufacturing, a method for its production, and to its use in additive manufacturing.