Refrigeration system and method for automated charging and start-up control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional refrigeration system start-up and installation methods require technician input, leading to inefficiencies and potential damage, especially when performed by inexperienced technicians, resulting in wasted energy and suboptimal performance.

Innovation Solution

An automated system with a controller that cycles compressors, monitors refrigerant conditions, and adjusts demand signals to manage suction pressure, refrigerant levels, and power source conditions, enabling partial and full system operation without manual intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual technician intervention is used for system start-up and refrigerant charging, then system installation can be completed, but inefficiency and potential system damage occur due to human error and lack of experience

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem start-up reliabilityVSAvoidtechnician operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-charging and self-start-up operations through automated control. The controller automatically cycles compressors, monitors refrigerant conditions, adjusts demand signals, and manages suction pressure without requiring manual technician intervention for refrigerant charging or system start-up procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary automated actions before full operation begins. The controller pre-charges the system with refrigerant, pre-cools components, and gradually increases demand signals to prepare the system for full operation, eliminating the need for manual preparation steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If automated control is implemented for refrigerant charging and start-up, then efficiency and energy consumption improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem start-up efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller performs multiple functions including compressor cycling, refrigerant condition monitoring, demand signal adjustment, suction pressure management, and fault detection. This multi-functional approach consolidates what could be separate complex systems into a single integrated control unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors refrigerant conditions, suction pressure, and compressor performance, then automatically adjusts demand signals and cycling operations based on this feedback. This closed-loop control enables efficient automated operation without requiring overly complex manual intervention systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of energy

If gradual demand signal increase is used during start-up, then system performance optimizes and energy waste reduces, but start-up time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy waste during start-upVSAvoidsystem start-up time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The demand signal is dynamically adjusted during the start-up process rather than being fixed. The controller gradually increases the demand signal based on real-time system conditions, refrigerant charge status, and compressor performance, optimizing the balance between start-up time and energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The controller uses periodic compressor cycling during start-up to gradually build system pressure and refrigerant circulation. This periodic operation allows the system to warm up efficiently before transitioning to continuous full operation, reducing energy waste while managing start-up time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentEP3246640B1Refrigeration system and method for automated charging and start-up control
Publication Date: 2020.11.25 HILLPHOENIX INC
  • EP3246640B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3246640B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3246640B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system for starting a refrigeration system (100) includes a liquid line regulating valve (114), a liquid line charging valve (112), a suction line expansion valve (118), a suction line charging valve (116), and a controller (202). The controller is configured to override normal operation of the refrigeration system (100) and transmit a demand signal to enable partial system operation. The controller (202) is configured to operate the liquid line regulating valve (114) and the liquid line charging valve (112) to charge a receiver tank (104), gradually increase the demand signal to a predetermined level of partial system operation, and release the liquid line charging valve (112) to normal operation. The controller (202) is configured to operate the suction line expansion valve (118) and the suction line charging valve (116) to charge a suction line, gradually increase the demand signal to full system operation, and release the liquid line regulating valve (114), the suction line expansion valve (118), and the suction line charging valve (116) to normal operation.