Refrigeration System Charging Using Superheat-Based Feedback Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Refrigeration systems face performance degradation and reliability issues due to incorrect refrigerant charge, especially in microchannel heat exchangers which require precise control of refrigerant amount, as improper charge affects cooling capacity and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A method for determining an ideal refrigerant charge and adjusting it by using a test system to develop a charge percentage map, correlating field system information with test data to calculate the optimal charge percentage and adjustment, involving sensors and a controller to manage the refrigerant charge in HVAC systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If microchannel heat exchangers are used to reduce refrigerant charge, then system efficiency and environmental compliance improve, but the system becomes more sensitive to charge errors and harder to charge correctly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem efficiencyVSAvoidcharge sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by measuring actual system performance parameters (superheat, subcooling, pressures, temperatures) and using these measurements to calculate and guide refrigerant charge adjustments. The controller continuously monitors system state and provides feedback to determine optimal charge levels, resolving the sensitivity issue through active measurement and adjustment rather than passive charging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical charge adjustment methods with electronic sensing and computational control. Instead of relying on manual gauges and mechanical adjustments, the system uses electronic sensors to measure thermodynamic parameters and a controller to calculate charge percentages, substituting mechanical intuition with electronic measurement and algorithmic determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If traditional charging methods are used, then the process is simple and quick, but the refrigerant charge accuracy is poor leading to performance degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging speedVSAvoidcharge accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the system to self-determine its optimal charge level by measuring its own operating parameters and calculating the appropriate charge percentage. The controller uses built-in sensors to monitor superheat, subcooling, and pressure differential, then autonomously computes the charge adjustment needed, allowing the system to self-optimize without external intervention while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces computational algorithms and control logic as intermediaries between the physical charging process and the desired charge accuracy. Rather than directly correlating physical actions with charge levels, the system uses intermediate measurements (superheat, subcooling, pressures) and computational processing to mediate the charging decision, ensuring high accuracy while maintaining operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If field charging is performed without test data correlation, then the process is faster and requires less equipment, but the charge determination reliability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging equipmentVSAvoidcharge determination reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary characterization of the system through test data collection and correlation before field charging operations. By pre-establishing the relationship between system geometry, operating conditions, and optimal charge levels through controlled testing, the system creates a knowledge base that can be applied during field operations, ensuring reliable charge determination without requiring complex test equipment during actual charging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent determines charge levels by monitoring changes in key thermodynamic parameters (superheat, subcooling, pressure differential) rather than relying on absolute values or complex equipment. By focusing on parameter changes and their relationships, the system achieves reliable charge determination using simple, readily available measurements that can be taken during normal system operation without specialized test equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10473371B2System and method for charging a refrigeration system
Publication Date: 2019.11.12 NORDYNE INC
  • US10473371B2 patent drawing
  • US10473371B2 patent drawing
  • US10473371B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for charging a field refrigeration system including an evaporator, a condenser, a compressor, and an expansion device includes calculating a target superheat as a function of one or more of a measured field outdoor dry bulb temperature, and a measured field indoor wet bulb temperature. A charge adjustment percentage can be calculated as a function of the target superheat. A refrigerant adjustment weight can be determined based on the charge adjustment percentage. A field refrigeration system charge can be adjusted by the refrigerant adjustment weight.