Refrigeration cycle device

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing refrigeration cycle devices struggle to optimize compression efficiency between single-stage and two-stage compression operations, leading to suboptimal performance and energy efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A refrigeration cycle device with a control unit that dynamically switches between single-stage and two-stage compression operations based on the required capacity of the refrigerant circuit, using a four-way switching valve and variable compressor speeds to maximize compression efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If two-stage compression operation is performed, then compression efficiency is improved under high pressure differential conditions, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression efficiencyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between single-stage and two-stage compression operations based on real-time pressure differential conditions. The control unit monitors the pressure differential and activates the appropriate compression stage, making the system adaptable rather than static, thereby resolving the contradiction between efficiency improvement and complexity increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The compression process is segmented into two distinct stages with separate compression mechanisms. This segmentation allows the system to handle high pressure differential conditions more efficiently by distributing the compression work across two stages, while the segmentation is only activated when needed, minimizing the impact on device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If single-stage compression operation is performed, then device complexity is reduced, but compression efficiency deteriorates under high pressure differential conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidcompression efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamic control to switch between single-stage and two-stage operations based on pressure differential thresholds. When the pressure differential is below the threshold, the system operates in simpler single-stage mode; when it exceeds the threshold, it transitions to two-stage mode, thus adapting complexity to actual operational needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit changes operational parameters by switching between different compression modes based on the pressure differential parameter. This parameter-driven approach allows the system to optimize compression efficiency by selecting the appropriate compression stage configuration according to real-time conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If two-stage compression operation is performed, then compression efficiency is improved, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit implements feedback control by continuously monitoring the pressure differential between suction and discharge sides and using this information to determine whether to activate single-stage or two-stage compression. This feedback mechanism automates the decision-making process, reducing the burden on operators while maintaining optimal compression efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-adjustment by automatically selecting the appropriate compression mode based on monitored pressure conditions. The control unit independently manages the switching between compression stages without requiring external intervention, thereby improving efficiency while keeping control complexity manageable through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device achieves improved compression efficiency by selecting the operation mode (single-stage or two-stage) that offers higher efficiency based on the current refrigerant circuit requirements, thereby enhancing energy efficiency and operational performance.

Implementation Method 1

a heat-source-side heat exchanger (24), an expansion mechanism (26), and a use-side heat exchanger (27)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS12276444B2Refrigeration cycle device
Publication Date: 2025.04.15 DAIKIN INDUSTRIES LTD
  • US12276444B2 patent drawing
  • US12276444B2 patent drawing
  • US12276444B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A refrigerant circuit includes a first compressor, a second compressor, a heat-source-side heat exchanger, an expansion mechanism, and a use-side heat exchanger. The refrigerant circuit is capable of performing a single-stage compression operation in which one of the first compressor and the second compressor is driven and the other is stopped, and a two-stage compression operation in which both the first compressor and the second compressor are driven. The control unit controls the refrigerant circuit so that, of the single-stage compression operation and the two-stage compression operation, an operation with a higher compression efficiency is performed.