Refrigeration cycle device

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Refrigerating cycle apparatuses using prior-art ejectors experience performance degradation due to pressure loss when the ejector is bypassed, leading to reduced cooling efficiency.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a check valve or a movable nozzle section with an electromagnetic coil to bypass the ejector during low ejector performance conditions, reducing pressure loss by minimizing internal flow resistance and maintaining efficient refrigerant circulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the ejector is bypassed during normal operation, then the refrigerating cycle apparatus can operate when ejector performance is lowered, but pressure loss occurs while passing through the suction section of the ejector causing performance degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational reliabilityVSAvoidpressure loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The suction section of the ejector is extracted and replaced with a check valve in the bypass line. This removes the harmful pressure loss component from the bypass path while maintaining the ability to bypass the ejector when needed, thus resolving the contradiction between operational reliability and pressure loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

A check valve is introduced as an intermediary component in the bypass line. This check valve allows refrigerant to pass through the bypass with minimal resistance when the ejector is not functioning, while preventing backflow. It mediates between the need to bypass the ejector and the need to minimize pressure loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of energy

If a check valve is installed in the bypass line, then pressure loss is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure lossVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The check valve is designed to operate automatically based on pressure differential, without requiring external control systems. It self-regulates the bypass flow based on ejector performance, reducing device complexity while maintaining low pressure loss benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of energy

If the check valve is positioned near the compressor suction, then pressure drop at compressor suction is prevented, but the risk of liquid refrigerant damage to compressor increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure dropVSAvoidliquid damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The check valve is positioned upstream of the compressor suction to preliminarily establish proper pressure conditions before refrigerant enters the compressor. This preliminary pressure stabilization prevents both excessive pressure drop and liquid slugging by ensuring proper vaporization occurs before compression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The bypass line with check valve is designed with specific local characteristics (diameter, length, positioning) optimized for pressure recovery without creating liquid accumulation zones. The local geometry is tailored to prevent liquid damage while maintaining pressure benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution significantly reduces pressure loss and enhances cooling performance by preventing pressure drop at the compressor suction section, thereby improving the Coefficient Of Performance (COP) and maintaining efficient refrigeration cycles.

Implementation Method 1

Incorporating a check valve or a movable nozzle section with an electromagnetic coil to bypass the ejector during low ejector performance conditions, reducing pressure loss by minimizing internal flow resistance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure loss reduction through minimized flow resistance:

Implementation Method 2

movable nozzle section with an electromagnetic coil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic actuation: Electromagnet

Data Source

PatentEP2330364B1Refrigeration cycle device
Publication Date: 2019.11.13 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • EP2330364B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2330364B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2330364B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

To obtain a refrigerating cycle apparatus that reduces a pressure loss at the time of a normal operation in which an ejector is bypassed to improve refrigeration cycle performance. A second throttle apparatus 12 is installed on piping path between the outlet of a condenser 2, which is a radiator, and the outlet of a first throttle device 11. A check valve 13 is installed on piping path between a gas refrigerant suction section 41 b of the ejector 3 and the outlet of the ejector 3.