Refrigeration Defrost Control Using Thermal Models and Causal Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing defrosting methods in refrigeration systems are sub-optimal, leading to incomplete or inaccurate defrosting operations due to non-uniform frost accumulation, sensor failures, and a lack of adaptive responses to historical frost trends, resulting in inefficient product preservation and failure to identify root causes of frosting issues.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a server that generates defrosting thermal models based on error signatures from refrigeration units, determining thermal features and behavior profiles to identify causes of defrost failures and recommend corrective actions, using machine learning to continuously learn and refine these models for proactive maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If time-based defrosting is used to ensure complete defrosting under all scenarios, then defrosting completeness is improved, but energy efficiency deteriorates and product shelf life is negatively impacted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefrosting completenessVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts defrosting parameters (temperature, duration, power level) based on real-time sensor data and historical frost accumulation patterns. Instead of using fixed time-based defrosting, the system continuously adapts the defrosting process to match actual frost conditions, ensuring complete defrosting while minimizing energy consumption and protecting product quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If existing adaptive defrosting methods use only recent defrost cycles to adjust defrost action, then responsiveness to recent changes is improved, but ability to capture historical frost trends deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponsiveness to recent changesVSAvoidhistorical frost trends
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges recent defrost cycle data with historical frost accumulation trends by maintaining a comprehensive database of past defrost operations and environmental conditions. This combination allows the system to respond to recent changes while also learning from long-term patterns, improving both adaptability and historical trend capture simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of operation

If existing defrosting methods are used without root cause analysis, then operational simplicity is maintained, but ability to provide accurate corrective actions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidaccuracy of corrective actions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism that continuously monitors defrosting performance, compares actual results with expected outcomes, and automatically adjusts defrosting parameters. When defrosting failures occur, the system analyzes sensor data to identify root causes (such as sensor failures, component issues, or environmental factors) and provides targeted corrective actions, maintaining operational simplicity while improving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4390274A1System and method for determining one or more corrective actions of one or more refrigeration units
Publication Date: 2024.06.26 CARRIER CORP
  • EP4390274A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4390274A1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP4390274A1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

A system (100) to determine one or more corrective actions for one or more refrigeration units (108-1,108-N) is disclosed. The system comprises a server (102) configured to generate a plurality of defrosting thermal models based on an analysis of a first set of data to generate a plurality of defrosting thermal models, determine, by the plurality of defrosting thermal models, one or more thermal features based on the first set of data and generate one or more behavior profiles associated with the one or more refrigeration units (108-1,108-N). The server (102) is further configured to define a distinguished causal mapping between the one or more thermal features and the one or more behavior profiles and determine one or more corrective actions for each of the plurality of self-executing defrost failure instances associated with one or more refrigeration units (108,108-N) based on the distinguished causal mapping.