Refrigerator Inner Case Assembly Using Interchangeable Material Sheets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing refrigerator inner case manufacturing methods are limited to resin materials and specific thicknesses, restricting material choice and design flexibility, as well as requiring additional molds for sheet replacements.

Innovation Solution

The refrigerator features an inner case composed of interchangeable sheets with varying thicknesses and materials, including metal and ceramic, which can be assembled without additional molds, using engagement mechanisms like sheet insertion grooves and flange couplings to ensure secure and leak-proof assembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the inner case is formed through a vacuum forming method using a sheet, then the manufacturing process is simple, but the material selection is limited to resin materials and specific thicknesses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing process simplicityVSAvoidmaterial selection flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The inner case is divided into multiple independent sheets (first sheet, second sheet, third sheet, fourth sheet) that can be selectively assembled. Each sheet can be made from different materials and thicknesses, allowing flexible material selection while maintaining simple manufacturing processes for each individual sheet.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The inner case uses composite construction by assembling multiple sheets made from different materials (resin, metal, ceramic) and thicknesses. This allows the system to benefit from the properties of different materials while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through standardized sheet production methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Adaptability or versatility

If the inner case is formed by attaching a metal sheet to a resin inner case, then material variety is increased, but the metal sheet type, thickness, and weight are limited by bonding requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial varietyVSAvoidmaterial selection constraints
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The inner case is segmented into multiple independent sheets that can be selectively assembled. This segmentation eliminates the need for bonding metal sheets to resin cases, as each sheet can be independently manufactured and assembled through mechanical engagement, removing material selection constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The engagement structure (protrusions and recesses) provides a universal connection method that works with any material type. This universal mechanism allows different materials (resin, metal, ceramic) to be combined without being limited by bonding compatibility requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If different thickness sheets are used in the inner case, then design flexibility is improved, but additional molds are required for sheet replacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign flexibilityVSAvoidmold requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The design allows changing the thickness parameter of individual sheets without requiring additional molds. By using standardized engagement structures that accommodate different thicknesses, the system achieves design flexibility while avoiding the need for specialized molding tools for each thickness variation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of manufacture

If the inner case uses fixed material and thickness, then manufacturing is simplified, but consumer preferences and thermal conductivity requirements cannot be met

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidconsumer preference accommodation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The inner case transitions from a fixed configuration to a dynamic, reconfigurable system where sheets can be selectively assembled and replaced. This allows the manufacturing process to remain simple for each sheet while enabling customization to meet consumer preferences and thermal conductivity requirements through different material and thickness combinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10907885B2Refrigerator
Publication Date: 2021.02.02 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US10907885B2 patent drawing
  • US10907885B2 patent drawing
  • US10907885B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a refrigerator including an inner case formed by a plurality of sheets being assembled. The refrigerator may include an inner case having various materials and shapes, and a sheet forming one side of the inner case may be replaceable.