Refueling Boom 3D Collision Guidance for Receiver Clearance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing air-to-air refueling systems face challenges in accurately guiding the refueling boom to avoid collisions with the receiving aircraft due to limited visibility and reliance on manual control, which can lead to potential contact and operational risks.

Innovation Solution

A boom guidance system utilizing a geometric segmentation collision avoidance methodology, employing sensors and an electronic control unit (ECU) to map 3D models of the receiver and boom, compute Euclidean radial distances, and execute flight control operations to prevent collisions by predicting and adjusting the boom's trajectory.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual control is used to guide the refueling boom, then operational flexibility is maintained, but collision avoidance precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidance precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary automated control system that acts as a mediator between the operator and the boom. The system uses sensors to detect the receiver aircraft's position and the boom's trajectory, processes this data through algorithms, and automatically adjusts boom control surfaces to prevent collisions, thereby improving precision without requiring full automation of the entire refueling process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical control with an automated electronic control system that uses sensors, processors, and actuators. The system substitutes human judgment and reaction with automated detection and control algorithms, enabling more precise collision avoidance while maintaining operational flexibility through programmable logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of information

If the boom operators rely on live video feed from cameras, then real-time monitoring is achieved, but visibility and spatial awareness are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial information lossVSAvoidvision system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple sensor inputs (cameras, range finders, GPS, inertial sensors) into a unified automated control system. By combining these diverse data sources, the system reconstructs complete spatial information about the receiver aircraft's position, orientation, and velocity, as well as the boom's trajectory, eliminating the information loss inherent in single-camera video feeds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a digital copy or virtual model of the physical refueling scene using sensor data. The system processes raw sensor inputs to generate accurate representations of the receiver aircraft's 3D position, attitude, and motion, as well as the boom's configuration, enabling precise collision prediction and avoidance without relying solely on operator interpretation of video images

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If automated control is implemented to guide the boom, then collision avoidance improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverefueling operation reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the refueling control system into distinct functional modules: sensor subsystems for detection, processing subsystems for data analysis and collision prediction, and actuator subsystems for boom control. This modular segmentation improves reliability by isolating functions and enabling independent testing and maintenance, while managing complexity through clear interface definitions between modules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements closed-loop feedback control where sensors continuously monitor the boom's position and the receiver aircraft's motion, the system predicts potential collisions based on this feedback, and automatic adjustments are made to boom control surfaces. This feedback mechanism enhances reliability by continuously adapting to changing conditions while maintaining manageable complexity through algorithmic control logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250319987A1Boom guidance system for automated air-to-air refueling
Publication Date: 2025.10.16 THE BOEING CO
  • US20250319987A1 patent drawing
  • US20250319987A1 patent drawing
  • US20250319987A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A boom control system includes sensors that output sensor data indicative of a three-dimensional (3D) position of a receiver aircraft and a refueling boom in respective reference frames. An electronic control unit (ECU) reads a 3D model of the receiver from memory. The sensor data includes a 3D position of the receiver and boom in respective reference frames. The ECU maps points in the receiver reference frame to the boom reference frame as mapped points using the 3D model of the receiver and a linear model of the boom. The ECU computes Euclidian distances between each of the mapped points and each respective point on the boom, determines a minimum Euclidian distance, and executes a flight control operation of the boom in response to the minimum Euclidian radial distance being less than a threshold minimum distance.