Telescoping Refueling Boom Control for Drift-Free Tube Positioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional aircraft refueling boom systems experience large command-to-position errors and telescoping tube drift due to reliance on either position control feedback or rate control feedback alone, which are insufficient for modern telescoping refueling boom actuators during in-flight operations.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that dynamically selects between telescoping tube rate control mode and position control mode based on current position error and rate of movement, using a processor to manage the actuator and transition between modes to maintain accurate control and prevent drift.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional position control feedback is used exclusively during free air maneuvering and fueling contact, then the control system is simple to operate, but large command-to-position errors occur while the boom is in contact with a receiver aircraft

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system operationVSAvoidcommand-to-position accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically transitions between position control mode and contact mode based on operational conditions. During free air maneuvering, position control maintains accurate positioning, while during contact operations, the system switches to contact mode to accommodate physical interaction with the receiver aircraft, thereby resolving the contradiction between operational simplicity and positioning accuracy across different flight phases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If a contact mode is used to allow the telescope to move freely with the receiver aircraft, then large command-to-position errors are negated during contact, but the telescoping tube experiences drift in the absence of operator commands

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommand-to-position accuracy during contactVSAvoidtelescoping tube position stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor telescoping tube position and operator input. During contact mode, feedback from the contact force sensors allows the tube to follow the receiver aircraft while maintaining force control. When no contact is detected or operator command is zero, feedback triggers a transition to position hold mode, preventing drift by actively maintaining the current position rather than allowing free movement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically switches between contact mode and position hold mode based on real-time detection of contact conditions and operator input. This dynamic transition ensures that the telescoping tube maintains stability during non-contact phases while accommodating contact movements during fueling operations, resolving the contradiction between contact accuracy and position stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Speed

If rate control feedback alone is used, then the system responds quickly to operator commands, but telescoping tube movement occurs even without operator input, resulting in tube drift

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speed to operator commandsVSAvoidtelescoping tube position stability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically transitions between rate control mode and position hold mode based on operational context. During active fueling operations with operator input, rate control provides rapid response to commands. When fueling is complete or no operator command is present, the system switches to position hold mode, which actively maintains the current position and prevents drift, thus resolving the contradiction between response speed and position stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3459856B1Telescoping refueling boom control systems and methods
Publication Date: 2022.03.02 THE BOEING CO
  • EP3459856B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3459856B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3459856B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Systems and methods according to one or more embodiments are provided for rate and position control modes used in the operations of a telescoping refueling boom system. In one example, a system includes a telescoping tube and an actuator coupled to the telescoping tube and configured to extend and/or retract the telescoping tube. A processor is coupled to the actuator and configured to select a telescoping tube rate control mode and/or a telescoping tube position control mode based on a telescoping tube current position error, a telescoping tube current rate of movement, and a value of a telescoping tube rate command. (Fig. 1)