Aircraft Refueling Controller Network for Data-Driven Upgrades

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft refueling systems lack efficient methods for modifications, upgrades, and data analysis, which hampers system performance and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

An integrated aircraft refueling system with a master controller, fleet controller, platform controller, and fuel control system, including a primary pressure controller, secondary pressure controller, programmable logic controller, and data logger controller, that enables data communication and analysis for remote upgrades and improved performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If refueling systems use standalone controllers without network connectivity, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability and ease of upgrade are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to receive modifications and upgradesVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is divided into separate functional modules: a processing unit, a memory unit storing instruction sets, and a communication interface. This segmentation allows the memory unit to be remotely updated via the communication interface without replacing the entire controller, enabling upgrades while maintaining system integrity and managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The communication interface is designed to support multiple functions: it serves as both a diagnostic port for local configuration and a network interface for remote software updates. This multi-functionality allows the same hardware component to enable both local control and remote adaptability, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and upgradeability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Loss of information

If refueling systems lack data communication capabilities, then device complexity is reduced, but loss of information and inability to analyze system performance are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission and analysis capabilityVSAvoidcommunication system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A communication interface acts as an intermediary between the controller and external systems. This interface handles all data transmission responsibilities, including sending operational data for analysis and receiving update instructions, thereby concentrating communication complexity in a single dedicated component rather than distributing it throughout the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where operational data is transmitted externally, analyzed, and used to generate optimization instructions that are sent back to the controller. This feedback mechanism enables continuous performance improvement while maintaining a relatively simple controller architecture that primarily executes received instructions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If controllers cannot be remotely upgraded, then ease of operation is improved, but productivity and system performance improvement are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem performance improvement rateVSAvoidcontroller modification complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The controller includes a communication interface and update mechanism prepared in advance, allowing software and instruction sets to be remotely updated before performance degradation occurs or when improvements are needed. This preliminary capability enables proactive system optimization without requiring physical access or system shutdown, thereby improving productivity while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If refueling systems operate without data logging and analysis, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability and predictive maintenance capability are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive maintenance capabilityVSAvoiddata logging and analysis system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically logs operational data and transmits it for analysis without requiring manual intervention. The controller monitors its own performance parameters, detects anomalies, and can trigger maintenance alerts autonomously. This self-service approach improves reliability through continuous monitoring while minimizing the complexity of manual data collection and analysis procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11794923B2Aircraft refueling system
Publication Date: 2023.10.24 EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LTD
  • US11794923B2 patent drawing
  • US11794923B2 patent drawing
  • US11794923B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aircraft refueling system (10) includes a master controller (12), a fleet controller (14) in communication with the master controller, a platform controller (18) in communication with the fleet controller, and a fuel control system (16) in communication with the platform controller. Embodiments of an aircraft refueling system may include a primary pressure controller (20), a secondary pressure controller (22), a programmable logic controller (24), and a data logger controller (26). The master controller may be configured to receive and analyze data from at least one of the fleet controller, the platform controller, and the fuel control system; and to modify operational parameters or upgrade the fuel control system based at least in part on the analysis of received data.