Aircraft Refueling Nozzle Height Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fluid systems, such as those used in aircraft refueling, do not account for differences in fluid filling heights, leading to pressure drops that reduce filling efficiency due to varying wing heights of aircraft.

Innovation Solution

A fluid system with sensors and a controller that regulate fluid flow and pressure, compensating for nozzle height differences by calculating expected nozzle pressure based on flow rate, pressure, and height differences, using equations like P2e=P1-(Q2*Cv*62.4*ρ) and adjusting the fluid regulator to maintain desired pressure at the nozzle.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the fluid system uses a fixed calibration height for refueling, then the system is simple to operate, but the fluid fill efficiency decreases when aircraft wing heights differ from the calibration height

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid fill efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the regulator setpoint pressure based on the actual nozzle height. The controller receives height information from sensors and modifies the target pressure accordingly, allowing the system to adapt to different aircraft configurations rather than relying on a fixed calibration height

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by using height sensors to detect the actual nozzle position and feeding this information back to the controller. The controller then adjusts the regulator setpoint based on this feedback, creating a closed-loop system that maintains optimal fill efficiency across varying heights

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the system compensates for nozzle height differences by adjusting regulator setpoint pressure, then the fluid fill efficiency is maintained, but the device complexity increases due to additional sensors and control mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid fill efficiencyVSAvoidnumber of sensors and controllers
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The height sensors serve multiple functions: they detect nozzle height, provide input for pressure calculation, and enable the system to handle various aircraft types. The controller performs multiple tasks including receiving sensor data, calculating required pressure adjustments, and regulating the fluid flow, reducing the need for separate dedicated components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the pressure parameter dynamically based on height variations. By adjusting the regulator setpoint pressure according to the actual nozzle height, the system maintains optimal fill conditions without requiring physical recalibration or multiple fixed-pressure regulators

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the system recalibrates for different aircraft wing heights, then the measurement precision improves, but the loss of time increases due to recalibration requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenozzle height measurement accuracyVSAvoidrecalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary height detection and pressure calculation before the refueling operation begins. By measuring the nozzle height and calculating the appropriate regulator setpoint in advance, the system eliminates the need for time-consuming recalibration during the refueling process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual recalibration procedures with automated sensor-based height detection and electronic pressure regulation. Instead of mechanical adjustment of regulators for different aircraft, the system uses electronic sensors and controllers to automatically adapt to varying heights

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Device complexity

If the system maintains fixed pressure regulation, then the device complexity is low, but the fluid pressure at the nozzle varies with height differences affecting fill performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure regulation simplicityVSAvoidconsistent fluid pressure at nozzle
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure regulation transitions from static to dynamic. The regulator setpoint is no longer fixed but changes dynamically based on the detected nozzle height, ensuring consistent pressure at the nozzle regardless of height variations while maintaining relatively simple regulation hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively compensates for nozzle height differences, maintaining efficient fluid fill times and pressures across different aircraft wing heights without the need for recalibration, reducing fueling time and ensuring consistent performance.

Implementation Method 1

Height differences may result in a pressure drop in the fluid system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure drop: Pressure Drop

Implementation Method 2

a height sensor that may be configured to determine a nozzle height

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Implementation Method 3

a flow sensor that may be configured to sense a fluid flow rate of fluid in said fluid conduit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow rate measurement:

Implementation Method 4

a pressure sensor that may be configured to sense a fluid pressure of the fluid conduit downstream of the fluid regulator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure measurement:

Data Source

PatentUS10322821B2High wing compensation system
Publication Date: 2019.06.18 EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LTD
  • US10322821B2 patent drawing
  • US10322821B2 patent drawing
  • US10322821B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure includes a fluid system that may include a fluid conduit (30) that may be configured for connection with a fluid source (20) and a fluid destination (80). The system may include a fluid regulator (40) that may be configured to regulate fluid flow between said fluid source (20) and said fluid destination (80). The system may include a nozzle (66) that may be connected to the fluid conduit and may configured to connect the fluid conduit with said fluid destination. The system may include a first sensor (70.1) that may be connected to the fluid conduit, and a second sensor (70.4) that may be configured to acquire information from which a height of the nozzle can be determined. The system may include a controller (50) that may be configured to control operation of the fluid regulator according to (i) an output of the first sensor and (ii) the information acquired by the second sensor.