Refund Prediction-Based Payment Processing Delay

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Card-based payment processing systems incur significant fees for transactions and refunds, with existing methods failing to efficiently determine when to delay processing requests to minimize these costs.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses data modeling and machine learning to predict the likelihood of a transaction being associated with a refund request, allowing for strategic delays in sending authorization or capture requests to avoid additional fees.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If authorization or capture requests are sent immediately for all transactions, then transaction processing speed is improved, but fees increase due to processing both successful transactions and transactions that will later be refunded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction processing speedVSAvoidfee cost
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of transaction data using machine learning models before sending authorization or capture requests. By predicting the likelihood of refund in advance, the system determines which transactions should be delayed, avoiding unnecessary processing fees while maintaining speed for transactions unlikely to be refunded.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the timing parameter of transaction processing based on predicted refund probability. For transactions with high refund likelihood, the authorization or capture request timing is delayed until after the refund prediction window expires, transforming the fixed immediate-processing approach into a flexible timing strategy that reduces fees.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If authorization or capture requests are delayed for potential refund transactions, then fee costs are reduced, but transaction processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefee costVSAvoidtransaction processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different processing strategies to different transactions based on their individual refund probability predictions. High-risk transactions receive delayed processing while low-risk transactions proceed immediately, creating localized quality differences in processing timing that optimize overall fee reduction without uniformly increasing processing time for all transactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system delays processing only for the subset of transactions predicted to be refunded, rather than delaying all transactions. This partial action approach ensures that fee-reducing delays are applied selectively to minimize their impact on overall processing time while still achieving cost savings on the problematic transactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If machine learning models analyze all transaction data, then refund prediction accuracy is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverefund prediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments transactions into different risk categories based on preliminary analysis, then applies appropriate processing delays only to high-risk segments. This segmentation allows the machine learning models to focus computational resources on predicting refunds for the most problematic transactions rather than uniformly processing all transactions, reducing overall computational complexity while maintaining accuracy for critical cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10915900B1Interchange action delay based on refund prediction
Publication Date: 2021.02.09 BLOCK INC
  • US10915900B1 patent drawing
  • US10915900B1 patent drawing
  • US10915900B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for leveraging a likelihood that a transaction (or a portion thereof) will be associated with a refund request to determine whether and/or how long to delay sending, to a payment service, a request for processing the transaction (or portion thereof) are described herein. In an example, a payment processing service may receive, from a point of sale device operated by a merchant, transaction data associated with a transaction between the merchant and a customer. The payment processing service may determine a likelihood that the customer will request a refund for a cost of an item of the transaction at a time after the transaction. Based at least partly on the likelihood, the payment processing service may determine whether to wait until at least the time before sending, to a payment service, a request to process the transaction data for at least the cost of the item.