Regenerative Braking Control Using Driving Conditions and Battery SOC

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicles equipped with battery power, such as electric vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles, and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, face challenges in efficiently managing regenerative braking, particularly when the battery is fully charged, leading to increased load on brake components and potential durability issues.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method for controlling regenerative braking based on driving information, including a driving information generation device, a controller, and a charging device. This system generates driving information, such as slope values and elevation differences, to determine when to prohibit regenerative braking and adjust battery charging accordingly, thereby optimizing brake load and battery state-of-charge.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If regenerative braking is used to charge the battery, then energy economy is improved, but brake load increases when the battery is fully charged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy economyVSAvoidbrake durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the regenerative braking control strategy based on real-time battery state-of-charge (SOC) levels and driving conditions. When SOC is high, the controller reduces or prohibits regenerative braking to prevent excessive brake load, while allowing it when SOC is low to improve energy economy. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between energy recovery and brake durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The controller changes the regenerative braking parameter (brake torque allocation) based on battery SOC status. By monitoring battery charge level and adjusting the regenerative braking intensity accordingly, the system optimizes both energy recovery efficiency and brake component longevity, preventing the contradiction from manifesting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If regenerative braking is prohibited to reduce brake load, then brake durability is improved, but battery SOC required for driving is not obtained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake durabilityVSAvoidbattery SOC
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between regenerative braking and friction braking modes based on battery SOC thresholds and predicted driving conditions. This dynamic control ensures that regenerative braking is utilized sufficiently to maintain required battery SOC while preventing excessive brake load through timely mode switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The controller performs preliminary assessment of battery SOC status and driving conditions before determining regenerative braking strategy. By predicting future energy needs and current brake wear status, the system proactively adjusts regenerative braking intensity to prevent both excessive brake load and insufficient battery charging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Strength

If regenerative braking is adjusted based on battery charge status, then brake load is optimized, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake load managementVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller integrates multiple functions into a single control unit: it monitors battery SOC, determines driving conditions, calculates optimal regenerative braking torque, and switches between braking modes. This multi-functional integration achieves sophisticated brake load management without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback control by continuously monitoring battery SOC and brake status, then adjusting regenerative braking intensity accordingly. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables intelligent optimization of brake load while maintaining relatively simple control logic through rule-based decision making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces the load on brake components by intelligently managing regenerative braking based on driving conditions, thereby enhancing the durability of brake parts and optimizing battery charging.

Implementation Method 1

a motor generator that operates as a generator during regenerative braking

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a battery that is charged based on operation of the motor generator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical energy storage: Battery (electricity)

Data Source

PatentUS12325330B2Apparatus controlling regenerative braking for battery charging based on driving condition, and method thereof
Publication Date: 2025.06.10 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US12325330B2 patent drawing
  • US12325330B2 patent drawing
  • US12325330B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus of controlling regenerative braking for battery charging according to driving information may include a driving information generation device that generates the driving information of a vehicle, a controller that is configured to control regenerative braking of the vehicle according to the generated driving information, and a charging device that controls charging of a battery of the vehicle according to the controlled regenerative braking.