Regenerative Braking for Vehicle Ramp Descent Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle access ramp systems lack efficient control over the rate of descent and ascent, particularly during manual operation, leading to potential free fall and increased energy requirements when transitioning between stowed and deployed positions.

Innovation Solution

A regenerative braking system utilizing a motor with shunted and non-shunted modes, controlled by electromechanical switches that detect the ramp's position and direction, to manage the rate of descent and ascent, allowing for controlled movement without external power sources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a motor is used to move the ramp between deployed and stowed positions, then the ramp can be powered to move, but the system requires additional energy and complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepowered mode operationVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The motor serves dual functions: driving the ramp during powered operation and providing regenerative braking during uncontrolled descent. The motor recovers energy during downward movement by generating electrical current when the ramp descends, converting mechanical energy back to electrical energy, thus the system serves itself by using the same component for both propulsion and energy recovery

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system recovers energy that would otherwise be lost during uncontrolled descent. When the ramp moves downward under gravity, the motor acts as a generator to capture the gravitational potential energy and convert it to electrical energy, preventing energy waste and potentially storing it for later use

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

2Ease of operation

If the ramp is allowed to move freely between positions, then manual operation is easier, but the ramp may free fall causing safety issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual mode operationVSAvoiduncontrolled descent
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The motor acts as an intermediary between the ramp and the user during manual operation. When the ramp descends under gravity, the motor provides regenerative braking that mediates the uncontrolled motion, converting the gravitational force into useful electrical energy while controlling the descent rate, thus preventing free fall without requiring active user intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If a damping mechanism is added to prevent free fall, then safety is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrolled descentVSAvoiddamping mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The motor performs multiple functions: it drives the ramp during powered operation, provides regenerative braking during uncontrolled descent, and enables energy recovery. By making the motor multi-functional, the patent eliminates the need for separate damping mechanisms, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining controlled descent capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Loss of energy

If regenerative braking is implemented to control descent rate, then energy recovery is possible, but the motor control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy recoveryVSAvoidmotor control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from detecting the ramp's position and direction of movement to automatically control the motor's operating mode. When the ramp is moving downward, the system detects this and automatically engages regenerative braking mode, creating a closed-loop control system that manages energy recovery without requiring complex manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively prevents free fall and optimizes energy use by generating torque opposite to the ramp's movement, ensuring safe and efficient transitions between positions, even in manual operation, without increasing the force needed to counteract gravity.

Implementation Method 1

The motor has a shunted mode and a non-shunted mode. The motor may generate torque opposite to the direction of movement of the ramp when in the shunted mode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS9125778B2Regenerative braking system for a vehicle ramp
Publication Date: 2015.09.08 RICON CORP
  • US9125778B2 patent drawing
  • US9125778B2 patent drawing
  • US9125778B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A ramp assembly includes a ramp movable between a deployed position, a stowed position, and an intermediate position and a drive mechanism comprising a motor configured to move the ramp between the deployed position and the stowed position. The motor has a shunted mode and a non-shunted mode. The assembly further includes a first detecting arrangement configured to detect a position of the ramp and a second detecting arrangement configured to detect a direction of movement of the ramp, with the motor being placed in one of the shunted mode and the non-shunted mode based on the position and the direction of movement of the ramp.