Regenerative Coasting Control Using Environmental Artifact Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional electrified vehicles do not effectively consider environmental artifacts during regenerative braking, leading to inefficient coast down conditions that require driver intervention.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilizes sensors to gather dynamic and static environmental data to determine optimal deceleration rates, adjusting regenerative braking based on artifacts like moving objects and road signs, ensuring smooth coast down and efficient energy recovery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If conventional regenerative braking applies minimum torque as a function of vehicle velocity, then energy recovery is achieved, but the vehicle does not consider surrounding artifacts leading to inefficient coast down conditions requiring driver intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy recovery efficiencyVSAvoiddriver intervention requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by using sensors to detect artifacts (traffic signs, road conditions, other vehicles) ahead of time and pre-calculating the optimal deceleration profile. This allows the vehicle to automatically adjust regenerative braking torque before the driver would need to intervene, maintaining energy efficiency while eliminating the need for driver input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring environmental artifacts and vehicle state, then adjusting the regenerative braking torque in real-time. The controller receives sensor data about surrounding conditions and feeds this information back to modify the deceleration rate, ensuring the vehicle responds appropriately to environmental factors without driver intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of energy

If the vehicle coasts during regenerative braking without considering environmental artifacts, then energy recovery occurs, but the deceleration may be insufficient when artifacts ahead require the vehicle to slow down more

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregenerative braking energy recoveryVSAvoidvehicle deceleration rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by making the regenerative braking torque adjustable and adaptive rather than fixed. The controller dynamically modifies the deceleration rate based on detected artifacts and predicted driving scenarios, allowing the vehicle to transition between coasting (for energy recovery) and active deceleration (when artifacts require it) seamlessly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system acts as an intermediary between the regenerative braking system and environmental conditions. It processes sensor data about artifacts and translates this information into appropriate torque adjustments, mediating between the need for energy recovery and the need to respond to environmental factors requiring additional deceleration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If the vehicle increases deceleration to respond to environmental artifacts, then driveability improves, but energy efficiency may be reduced due to increased braking torque

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedriveabilityVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes parameters by adjusting the regenerative braking torque level based on detected artifacts and predicted scenarios. Rather than using fixed torque values, the controller modifies electrical parameters (torque, power) dynamically to optimize both driveability and energy efficiency for each specific driving condition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances driveability and energy efficiency by intelligently modulating regenerative braking to match the vehicle's deceleration with environmental conditions, optimizing coast down without driver input.

Implementation Method 1

the electric motor further providing regenerative braking energy to a battery system during a deceleration event

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The first sensor comprises one of a camera and radar that senses a moving object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Implementation Method 3

The second sensor comprises a global positioning system (GPS) that provides data indicative of a road sign, an intersection, a road slop and road form

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGlobal positioning system:

Data Source

PatentUS20250304031A1System and method for determining deceleration based on environmental information
Publication Date: 2025.10.02 FCA US LLC
  • US20250304031A1 patent drawing
  • US20250304031A1 patent drawing
  • US20250304031A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system that implements a dynamically adjusting coasting regeneration for an electrified vehicle includes an electrified powertrain, first and second sensors and a controller. The electrified powertrain includes an electric motor that provides drive torque to a driveline. The first sensor senses dynamic artifact data. The second sensor senses one of static and pseudo-static artifact data. The controller is configured to receive a current velocity of the vehicle; determine first and second candidate deceleration rates based on the data; estimate a first proposed change in velocity over a first time based on the first and second deceleration rates; determine a second proposed change in velocity over a second time based on the first proposed change in velocity; determine a proposed total distance travelled by the vehicle based on the second proposed change in velocity; and determine whether a target velocity has been reached based on the proposed total distance.