Embedded Regenerative Licensing for Hardware Capability Transfer
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Customers face limitations in upgrading devices for additional capabilities due to licensing restrictions tied to hardware identity, which hinder capability upgrades and hardware substitutions.
Innovation Solution
A method and system for embedded regenerative licensing, where a hardware adapter manages capability requests and responses, enabling the disabling of functions on one device and enabling corresponding functions on another, using unique identifiers and timestamps to facilitate seamless upgrades and transfers.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If licensing rights are tied to hardware identity, then device security and licensing control are improved, but capability upgrade opportunities and hardware substitution flexibility deteriorate
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the licensing system into multiple components: hardware identity verification, capability licensing, and transfer mechanism. The licensing is divided into capability-specific rights that can be independently managed and transferred, rather than being permanently bound to hardware identity. This allows the system to maintain security through identity verification while enabling flexibility through capability segmentation and transfer.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements a dynamic licensing system where capability rights are not static but can be transferred between devices over time. The licensing control adapts to changing customer needs by allowing capability upgrades and hardware substitutions through a formal transfer process, making the system flexible rather than rigid while maintaining security controls.
2Reliability
If licensing is tied to specific hardware, then unauthorized use is prevented, but device substitution and upgrade paths are limited
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces a licensing authority as an intermediary between hardware identity and capability rights. This mediator manages the transfer of licensing rights through verified processes, ensuring unauthorized use prevention while facilitating legitimate device substitutions. The intermediary controls the transfer mechanism, maintaining security while enabling ease of operation for authorized changes.
Solution Approach 2:
The system changes the parameter of licensing from permanent hardware binding to time-bound and transferable capability rights. By changing how licensing parameters are defined (from static hardware ID to dynamic capability permissions), the system prevents unauthorized use while allowing authorized device substitutions and upgrades through parameter modification.
3Reliability
If capabilities are permanently licensed to hardware, then licensing security is maintained, but customer upgrade options and manufacturer flexibility deteriorate
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements preliminary verification and authorization actions before capability transfers occur. The system pre-establishes the framework for secure transfers, including identity verification processes and licensing authority approval mechanisms. This preliminary action maintains licensing security while enabling future upgrades and substitutions through pre-configured transfer pathways.
Solution Approach 2:
The system incorporates feedback loops where licensing transfers are tracked and verified. When capabilities are transferred to new hardware, the system provides feedback to maintain security records and update licensing states. This feedback mechanism ensures licensing security is maintained while enabling flexible upgrade paths through controlled transfer processes.
Data Source
AI summary
A method and system for embedded regenerative licensing are disclosed. According to one embodiment, a computer-implemented method, comprises transmitting a first capability request for a first hardware device to a hardware adapter. A second capability request for a second hardware device is transmitted to the hardware adapter. A first device capability response for the first hardware device is received from the hardware adapter. The first device capability response comprises a first timestamp, a first unique identifier for the first hardware device, and a first functions list to disable on the first hardware device. A second device capability response for the second hardware device is received from the hardware adapter. The second device capability response comprises a second timestamp, a second unique identifier for the second hardware device, and a second functions list including one or more functions from the first hardware device to enable on the second hardware device.


