Industrial Regime Change Detection Using Weighted Predictive Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods struggle to accurately detect changes in the regime of connected industrial assets or processes and anomalies in their operation, which is critical for maintaining business continuity and optimizing asset management.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize differential equations, machine learning models, and a specialized meta-model to continuously assign weights to predictive models, allowing for real-time detection of regime changes and anomalies by measuring differences between predicted and observed data, and updating calculations sequentially.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional monitoring methods are used to track industrial asset regimes, then the system structure remains simple, but the detection precision of regime changes and anomalies is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection precision of regime changesVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the monitoring system into multiple specialized predictive models, each responsible for detecting specific regime characteristics. These models process different aspects of asset behavior independently and their results are aggregated, allowing high detection precision without requiring a single overly complex monolithic system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a meta-model as an intermediary layer that aggregates predictions from multiple specialized predictive models. This meta-model coordinates the outputs of individual models and produces the final regime detection result, enabling complex detection capabilities while maintaining modular model structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If multiple predictive models are aggregated to improve detection accuracy, then the predictive precision increases, but the computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive accuracyVSAvoidcomputational processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary calibration of differential equations using machine learning models during an offline training phase. This pre-processing step prepares the predictive models in advance, so that during real-time operation, only lightweight inference and aggregation are required, significantly reducing online computational time while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic weighting of predictive models through the meta-model, which adaptively adjusts the contribution of each model based on current operating conditions. This dynamic approach allows the system to use only the most relevant models for each specific regime, reducing computational overhead while maintaining predictive accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If differential equations are calibrated using machine learning models to improve regime detection, then the detection reliability improves, but the device complexity and calibration requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidcalibration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-calibration mechanisms where the machine learning models automatically adjust differential equation parameters using operational data without requiring manual intervention. The system learns from historical data and continuously refines its predictions, maintaining high reliability while reducing the complexity of manual calibration procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the calibration problem into a parameter optimization task where machine learning models automatically adjust differential equation parameters based on observed asset behavior. This approach converts complex manual calibration into an automated parameter tuning process, improving reliability while managing calibration complexity through algorithmic optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Speed

If real-time sequential updating of predictive models is implemented to detect regime changes quickly, then the reactivity improves, but the computational load and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactivity to regime changesVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic re-calibration and updating of predictive models at strategically chosen intervals rather than continuous updating. The meta-model determines when regime transitions are likely and triggers model updates only at these critical moments, maintaining high reactivity to actual regime changes while minimizing unnecessary computational energy consumption during stable operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentEP4592781A1Detection of change in diet of connected industrial assets or processes
Publication Date: 2025.07.30 DATAPRED SA
  • EP4592781A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4592781A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4592781A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for detecting a change in the regime of a connected industrial asset or process and represented in operating data measurements from the industrial asset or process. The method comprises providing a database containing data generated from the operating data measurements from the industrial asset or process; providing differential equations describing different regimes of the industrial asset or process; applying machine learning models to the data in the database generated by the industrial asset or process, to calibrate the differential equations; basing at least one predictive model on the differential equations, to obtain a predictive model or group of predictive models per regime of the industrial asset or process;an aggregation of the predictive model or group of predictive models to predict a prediction of the data generated by the asset or industrial process; an implementation of a specialized metamodel to continuously assign, at determined time steps, a weight to each predictive model so as to maximize a predictive power of the whole, and sequentially verify the predictive power, by measuring at each time step, for the data generated by the asset or industrial process, a difference between data predicted by the aggregation of models and data observed in the aggregation step; a measurement of the weight of each predictive model in the aggregation, in order to determine a dominant predictive model having the greatest weight among all the weights measured within the aggregation; an observation of a process of change of regime of the asset or process when another predictive model becomes dominant within the aggregation;a sequential updating of all the calculations necessary in the preceding steps; and taking into account the observation of a change process resulting from the observation of a change process.;