Inkjet Printing Control for Region-Specific Layer Thickness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing printing technologies struggle to eject inks in appropriate amounts corresponding to specific regions on a printing medium, leading to inconsistent layer formation and image quality.

Innovation Solution

A printing apparatus with multiple inkjet heads and a control system that executes distinct printing operations, adjusting the ejection amounts of inks based on predefined or user-designated regions to form layers with precise thickness variations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single inkjet head is used to eject ink to the entire printing medium, then the device complexity is reduced, but the manufacturing precision of layer formation deteriorates because uniform ink ejection cannot satisfy both underlayer regions and image regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of inkjet headsVSAvoidlayer formation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The printing system is segmented into multiple inkjet heads (first inkjet head for underlayer, second inkjet head for image layer) that operate independently. Each head is assigned to specific printing operations and regions, allowing differentiated ink ejection control. The control device separately manages ejection amounts for each head based on region type, resolving the contradiction between device simplicity and layer formation precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the printing medium receive different ink ejection amounts from appropriate inkjet heads. The first inkjet head ejects appropriate amounts to the first region (underlayer only) and second region (image on underlayer), while the second inkjet head ejects image ink selectively to the second region. This local differentiation ensures precise layer formation without requiring complex single-head control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the ink ejection amount is increased to ensure adequate layer formation, then the reliability of layer completeness improves, but the loss of substance (ink consumption) increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayer formation completenessVSAvoidink consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different ink ejection amounts to different regions based on their specific requirements. The first inkjet head ejects appropriate amounts of first ink to both first and second regions for underlayer formation, while the second inkjet head ejects second ink only to the second region where image formation is needed. This prevents wasteful ink ejection to regions where it is not required, maintaining layer completeness while reducing overall ink consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The first inkjet head performs preliminary underlayer formation by ejecting first ink to both first and second regions before the second inkjet head forms the image layer. This preliminary action ensures that when the second ink is ejected, the underlying surface is already prepared, allowing for more efficient and targeted ink application that reduces total ink consumption while ensuring complete layer formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of substance

If the ink ejection amount is decreased to reduce ink consumption, then the loss of substance improves, but the manufacturing precision of layer formation deteriorates due to insufficient layer thickness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveink consumptionVSAvoidlayer thickness control
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The ink ejection function is segmented between two specialized heads: the first inkjet head is optimized for underlayer formation with appropriate ejection amounts to ensure sufficient thickness in both first and second regions, while the second inkjet head is optimized for image layer formation with precise ejection control. This segmentation allows each head to operate at optimal efficiency, maintaining layer thickness precision without excessive ink consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first inkjet head performs preliminary underlayer formation with sufficient ink amounts to ensure adequate base layer thickness in both first and second regions. This preliminary action creates a reliable foundation that reduces the need for excessive subsequent ink application, allowing the second inkjet head to form the image layer with precise, controlled amounts without compromising overall layer thickness quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of operation

If the ink ejection amounts for first and second regions are made equal to simplify control, then the ease of operation improves, but the manufacturing precision deteriorates because different regions require different ink amounts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidregion-specific layer precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control function is segmented between two inkjet heads with distinct roles. The first inkjet head is controlled to eject first ink to both first and second regions with appropriate amounts for underlayer formation. The second inkjet head is controlled to eject second ink only to the second region for image formation. This segmentation of control responsibilities maintains operational simplicity while achieving region-specific precision through specialized head assignments rather than complex unified control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system implements local quality by directing different ink types and amounts to different regions through appropriately assigned inkjet heads. The first head provides uniform underlayer coverage to both regions, while the second head provides targeted image ink only to the second region. This localized control strategy achieves region-specific precision without requiring complex real-time adjustment mechanisms, maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures accurate and controlled layer formation, enhancing image quality by adjusting ink ejection amounts to match specific regions, reducing ink consumption and preventing bleeding or thickness inconsistencies.

Implementation Method 1

a first inkjet head configured to eject a first liquid to a printing medium; a second inkjet head configured to eject a second liquid different from the first liquid to the printing medium

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInkjet ejection: Jet

Data Source

PatentUS12397545B2Printing apparatus, control method for printing apparatus, and non-transitory computer readable storage medium
Publication Date: 2025.08.26 BROTHER KOGYO KK
  • US12397545B2 patent drawing
  • US12397545B2 patent drawing
  • US12397545B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A printing apparatus is configured to execute first and second printing operations including forming a first layer by ejecting a first liquid to first and second regions, and forming a second layer by ejecting a second liquid on the first layer in the second region. In the first printing operation, the first liquid in a first predetermined amount is ejected to the first region and the first liquid in a second predetermined amount is ejected to the second region. In the second printing operation, the first liquid in a third predetermined amount is ejected to the first region and the first liquid in a fourth predetermined amount is ejected to the second region such that an absolute value of a difference between the fourth predetermined amount and the third predetermined amount is larger than that of a difference between the second predetermined amount and the first predetermined amount.