Regional Communicator Capability Deactivation With User Consent

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for achieving compliance with regulations, such as prohibiting certain behaviors in electronic devices, are inadequate as they may cause user offense or legal issues, and individually verifying compliance is impractical.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that detects the presence of communicators and conditions within defined regions, sends a request for user opt-in to deactivate specific capabilities, and executes actions based on user response, including deactivation or notification if consent is not given.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If devices are unilaterally deactivated or interference fields are generated to block signals, then compliance with regulations is achieved, but user offense and legal problems occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance with regulationsVSAvoiduser offense and legal problems
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by obtaining user consent before deactivating device capabilities. Users are presented with opt-in messages and must explicitly respond before any deactivation occurs, ensuring they understand and agree to the regulatory compliance measure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by monitoring user responses to opt-in messages and adjusting the deactivation process accordingly. The system waits for explicit user confirmation before proceeding with capability deactivation, allowing users to provide feedback on their understanding and acceptance of the regulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If individual verification of compliance is performed, then compliance accuracy is improved, but impracticality in execution occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance verification accuracyVSAvoidcompliance verification efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service compliance verification by having users actively participate in the opt-in process. Users receive messages and provide explicit responses confirming their understanding and acceptance of compliance requirements, making the verification process both accurate and feasible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If capabilities are deactivated without user consent, then regulatory compliance is enforced, but device functionality and user experience are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory complianceVSAvoiddevice functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by obtaining user consent before deactivating capabilities. Users are presented with opt-in messages and must explicitly respond before any deactivation occurs, ensuring they understand and agree to the regulatory compliance measure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic control of device capabilities based on user preferences and regulatory requirements. The capability deactivation is not fixed but adapts to individual user responses, allowing flexibility in maintaining functionality when users consent and restricting it when they do not.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250274545A1Method and apparatus for opt-in compliance with regulations
Publication Date: 2025.08.28 WEST TEXAS TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS LLC
  • US20250274545A1 patent drawing
  • US20250274545A1 patent drawing
  • US20250274545A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are methods, systems and paradigms for opt-in compliance with regulations. A region in physical space is defined. A condition for the region is defined, the condition being a capability of a communicator such as video recording, still image recording, audio recording, audio output, text messaging, audio communication, or remote connection. The presence and location of a communicator with the capability is detected in the region, and a message is sent to the communicator with a request for a response accepting or rejecting remote deactivation of the capability of the communicator. If an acceptance response is received, the communicator capability is deactivated. If an acceptance response is not received, a notification is generated that includes the lack of acceptance response and the location of the communicator.