Regional Cooling for Integrated Circuits Based on Failure Rate Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

System-on-chip (SOC) designs face challenges in managing heat dissipation effectively, leading to increased operating temperatures and costs, particularly due to over-design for worst-case scenarios, which can compromise acoustic performance and result in unnecessary power consumption and larger form factors.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a semiconductor device cooling system that leverages regional voltage and temperature reliability risk considerations by determining failure rates for each region of the SOC, calculating a heat dissipation factor to reduce temperatures, and dynamically adjusting cooling mechanisms to allow temperature increases in selected regions without exceeding overall failure rates, thereby reducing heat dissipation requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If greater measures are taken to dissipate heat, then reliability is improved, but device complexity and size increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure riskVSAvoidcooling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The integrated circuit is divided into multiple regions, each with its own temperature and failure rate characteristics. The cooling system is designed to target specific high-risk regions rather than uniformly cooling the entire device, reducing overall complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the integrated circuit are assigned different cooling requirements based on their specific failure rates, temperatures, and supply voltages. The cooling system applies localized heat dissipation measures to regions that need them most, rather than uniformly cooling all regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If greater measures are taken to dissipate heat, then reliability is improved, but device size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure riskVSAvoidheat sink size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using a large heat sink to cool the entire integrated circuit, the system segments the cooling approach by identifying and targeting only the specific regions that contribute most to failure risk, thereby reducing the required heat sink size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts cooling parameters based on actual operating conditions, including temperature, supply voltage, and failure rate of each region. This allows for reduced heat dissipation capacity compared to worst-case designs, reducing heat sink size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If higher supply voltages are used to increase performance, then productivity is improved, but temperature increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveperformanceVSAvoidoperating temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The system identifies regions with maximum supply voltage and correlates them with high failure rates. Cooling is specifically targeted to these high-voltage, high-temperature regions rather than applying uniform cooling across the entire device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses failure rate calculations based on temperature and voltage to dynamically adjust cooling requirements. This feedback mechanism allows the system to maintain reliability while optimizing the balance between performance and temperature management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If heat dissipation is increased to maintain reliability, then acoustic performance deteriorates, but reliability is improved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure riskVSAvoidacoustic performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies cooling only to the extent necessary to maintain reliability, rather than using excessive cooling capacity designed for worst-case scenarios. By targeting only the critical regions that contribute to failure risk, the system reduces the need for high-speed fans and minimizes acoustic interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces power consumption, material costs, and cooling system size by tailoring heat dissipation to actual operating conditions, maintaining reliability while minimizing acoustic interference and optimizing form factor in devices like smartphones and tablets.

Implementation Method 1

dissipate heat, typically at added expense, complexity and size

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat dissipation: Convection

Implementation Method 2

heat dissipation factor of the cooling system based on the failure rates of the regions, where implementation of the heat dissipation factor would, for each region, reduce its projected temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS9495491B2Reliability aware thermal design
Publication Date: 2016.11.15 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US9495491B2 patent drawing
  • US9495491B2 patent drawing
  • US9495491B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments are disclosed that relate to implementing semiconductor device cooling systems that leverage awareness of regional voltage and temperature reliability risk considerations. For example, one disclosed embodiment provides a method of implementing a cooling system configured to cool an integrated circuit. The method involves first determining a heat dissipation factor that would reduce each region of the integrated circuit to a reduced temperature in order to maintain an overall failure rate. An analysis is then performed, using an insight about the relative reliability risk of elevated voltage and temperatures, to identify a region of the integrated circuit whose temperature can be permitted to rise without exceeding the overall failure rate, thereby permitting implementation of a cooling system with a reduced heat dissipation factor.