Regional Generative and CNN Image Processing to Reduce Artifacts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image processing methods using machine learning models struggle to effectively sharpen blur on focal planes and shape defocus blur on non-focal planes without generating artificial structures, particularly in luminance-saturated areas and areas with low optical performance.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a combination of convolutional neural networks (CNN) for blur sharpening on focal planes and generative models like diffusion models for defocus blur shaping on non-focal planes, with weights assigned based on segmentation maps, optical performance, and saturated areas to control blur sharpening effects and prevent artificial structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If generative models are used for image deblurring and enhancement, then performance in regression tasks is improved, but artificial structures are generated in luminance-saturated areas and areas with low optical performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage enhancement accuracyVSAvoidartificial structures
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The image is divided into multiple areas based on optical performance characteristics and luminance saturation. Different machine learning models are selectively applied to different segments: generative models for areas with high optical performance and non-generative models for areas with low optical performance or high saturation, thereby reducing artificial structure generation while maintaining enhancement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the image are processed with different models according to their local characteristics. Areas with low optical performance or high luminance saturation use non-generative models to avoid artificial structures, while areas with high optical performance use generative models for enhanced accuracy, achieving local optimization of quality versus artifact generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple machine learning models are combined with different weights for different areas, then image processing accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage processing accuracyVSAvoidmodel combination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The image domain is segmented into multiple areas based on optical performance and luminance saturation characteristics. A plurality of machine learning models are prepared with different weight values, and these models are selectively applied to different segmented areas. This segmentation approach enables accurate image processing by matching appropriate models to specific regions while managing system complexity through structured organization of models and areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250245792A1Image processing method and storage medium
Publication Date: 2025.07.31 CANON KK
  • US20250245792A1 patent drawing
  • US20250245792A1 patent drawing
  • US20250245792A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing method includes a step of generating an estimated image from an input image by using a plurality of machine learning models including a generative model and a non-generative model. In the step, the estimated image is generated by assigning different weights to output of the generative model and output of the non-generative model for each of a plurality of areas of the input image based on information regarding the input image.