Regressive Progressive Lens Design for Gradient Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge in manufacturing progressive ophthalmic lenses lies in accurately positioning the lens on digital surfacing machines to maintain optical quality, particularly due to high gradients of sphere and cylinder values, which can lead to optical performance degradations and sensitivity to positioning errors.

Innovation Solution

A semi-finished lens blank with a regressive surface design featuring controlled sphere and cylinder gradients, and a fourth derivative value of less than 5.0 × 10^-5 mm^-2 diopter^-1, ensures a soft design that reduces gradient variations, making the machining process more feasible while maintaining optical quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional progressive surface design is used, then optical power correction is achieved, but positioning accuracy deteriorates due to high gradients of sphere and cylinder values

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidoptical performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the surface design parameters of the progressive lens. Specifically, it introduces a regressive surface with controlled sphere and cylinder gradients, where the fourth derivative of the sphere value with respect to altitude is limited to less than 5.0 × 10^-5 mm^-2 diopter^-1. This parameter control reduces the steepness of optical power variations across the lens surface, making the lens less sensitive to positioning errors during manufacturing while maintaining the required optical correction functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If high gradient sphere and cylinder values are used, then optical power correction is improved, but sensitivity to positioning errors increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical power correctionVSAvoidsensitivity to positioning errors
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter distribution across the lens surface by implementing a regressive design where sphere and cylinder gradients are controlled. The key parameter constraint is that the fourth derivative of the sphere value with respect to altitude must be less than 5.0 × 10^-5 mm^-2 diopter^-1. This creates a smoother transition of optical power across the lens, reducing the impact of positioning errors while preserving the necessary optical correction for presbyopic wearers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If regressive surface with controlled gradients is used, then positioning error impact is reduced, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning error toleranceVSAvoidsurface design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

While the surface design does introduce additional parameter constraints (controlling fourth derivatives), the patent simplifies the overall manufacturing approach by working with a regressive surface geometry that has more gradual transitions. This allows for more forgiving machining tolerances and less sensitive positioning requirements during digital surfacing, potentially offsetting the increased complexity of the surface design itself through improved manufacturing robustness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2691806B1Progressive ophthalmic lens
Publication Date: 2017.11.15 ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL(COMPAGNIE GENERALE D OPTIQUE)
  • EP2691806B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2691806B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2691806B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a progressive ophthalmic lens comprising a front surface and a rear surface, each surface having in each point an altitude, a mean sphere value and a cylinder value, the front surface of the lens comprising: - a far vision zone having a far vision reference point; - a near vision zone having a near vision reference point; - a main meridian, wherein the front surface is regressive and has: - a sphere gradient normalized value of less than 7.50.10-1 mm-1 at any point in a central portion of the lens including a portion of the main meridian (32), the far vision reference point (FV) and the near vision reference point (NV); - a cylinder gradient normalized value of less than 1.45 mm-1 at any point in the central portion of the lens.