Regulator Valve Biasing Design to Prevent Hard-Stop Seizing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Gas regulator valves often stick at hard stop positions due to the lack of positional feedback in electrically controlled systems, leading to loss of adjustability and potential valve failure, especially at elevated temperatures.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a biasing spring on the opposite side of the lifter drive screw, such as a wave washer or O-ring, to prevent sticking by applying a force that moves the lifter and drive screw away from the hard stop when the motor is de-energized, utilizing materials like steel, nylon, or silicone that meet temperature requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If the motor is driven into a hard stop to establish a known position, then the starting position is known for regulator range positioning, but the motor or drive screw tends to seize in place causing loss of adjustability and valve sticking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition informationVSAvoidvalve operation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A biasing spring is installed on the drive screw to apply a preliminary force that prevents the drive screw from seizing against the hard stop. The spring constant is specifically selected to be sufficient to back off the drive screw from the stop position, thereby preventing seizure before it can occur while maintaining known position information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The spring constant of the biasing spring is carefully selected to achieve the desired balance. It must be strong enough to prevent seizing by backing off the drive screw from the hard stop, but not so strong as to interfere with normal valve operation or motor control. This parameter optimization resolves the contradiction between maintaining position information and preventing seizure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If positional feedback systems are added to prevent seizing, then the motor can avoid sticking at hard stop positions, but the cost of electronics significantly increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve operation reliabilityVSAvoidelectronic system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The biasing spring creates a self-regulating system that automatically prevents seizing without requiring external monitoring or control electronics. When the motor approaches the hard stop, the spring's elastic force naturally backs off the drive screw, eliminating the need for sensors, feedback circuits, or complex control algorithms while maintaining reliable operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

A simple mechanical spring replaces expensive electronic feedback systems. The spring is a low-cost, passive component that provides the same seizure-prevention function without the high cost of electronics, making it economically viable for mass production while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Reliability

If the motor is driven into a hard stop for a short period and then backed off, then seizing might be prevented, but the exact position is lost and the valve position becomes uncertain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseizing preventionVSAvoidposition information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The biasing spring is pre-installed on the drive screw to continuously apply a backing force before the motor reaches the hard stop. This preliminary action prevents the drive screw from making full contact with the stop, eliminating the need for periodic backing-off operations and maintaining continuous, accurate position information throughout the valve's operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution ensures the valve maintains a known position and reduces the likelihood of sticking at hard stop positions, avoiding the need for costly positional feedback systems and maintaining adjustability.

Implementation Method 1

a biasing spring on the opposite side of the lifter drive screw, such as a wave washer or O-ring, to prevent sticking by applying a force that moves the lifter and drive screw away from the hard stop when the motor is de-energized

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11408516B1Adjustable regulator anti-seize valve
Publication Date: 2022.08.09 ROBERTSHAW CONTROLS CO
  • US11408516B1 patent drawing
  • US11408516B1 patent drawing
  • US11408516B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A regulator valve has an anti-seize feature when in the hard stop position. The valve is providing with a biasing force away from the hard stop position when in the hard stop position sufficient to prevent seizure of the drive screw in the hard stop position. This biasing force may be provided by a resilient member and/or a plastic, instead of a metal, adjusting screw which may provide sufficient resiliency to prevent seizing in the hard stop position. A resilient member could be a washer such as a spring washer, a wave washer, or even a compressible flat.