Re-identification System Direction Consistency Ranking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The accuracy of person re-identification across multiple videos taken from different viewpoints is reduced due to variations in the direction of the moving object, requiring significant labor to address this issue solely through re-identification model learning.

Innovation Solution

A re-identification system that calculates similarities and ranks features considering the direction of moving objects, using a processor to determine identity based on consistency with a ranking rule, improving the accuracy of the re-identification process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If re-identification model learning is used to handle direction variations, then re-identification accuracy may improve, but a great deal of labor is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvere-identification accuracyVSAvoidlabor time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by extracting direction information and pre-ranking similarities before final re-identification determination. The processor calculates direction of moving objects, ranks similarities based on direction consistency, and performs preliminary determination processes that reduce the need for extensive model learning and manual adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by calculating consistency between ranked similarities and direction information, then using this feedback to adjust the re-identification determination. The processor compares ranked similarities with direction data and uses this feedback loop to improve accuracy without requiring extensive retraining or manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If direction information is considered in re-identification, then re-identification accuracy improves, but the complexity of the re-identification process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvere-identification accuracyVSAvoidre-identification process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the re-identification process into distinct modules: direction extraction, similarity calculation, ranking based on direction consistency, and final determination. The processor divides the complex task into manageable segments where each component handles a specific aspect, making the overall process more manageable and maintainable while improving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds another dimension to the re-identification process by incorporating direction information as a separate feature space. Instead of only considering appearance features, the processor combines appearance similarity with directional orientation, creating a multi-dimensional assessment that improves accuracy without overwhelming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20240386697A1Re-identification system
Publication Date: 2024.11.21 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US20240386697A1 patent drawing
  • US20240386697A1 patent drawing
  • US20240386697A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A re-identification system temporarily performs a re-identification process for determining whether two moving objects shown in a plurality of videos are identical or not. Similarities between the two moving objects in the re-identification process are ranked in consideration of a direction of each moving object. The rank is highest when the two moving objects are identical and the two moving objects are same in the direction. The rank is lowest when the two moving objects are not identical and the two moving objects are different in the direction. A ranking rule is that the rank is higher as the similarity is higher. The re-identification system calculates a degree of consistency between the ranking result and the ranking rule. Then, the re-identification system finally determines whether the two moving objects are identical or not based on the degree of consistency in addition to the similarities.