Reinforced Bladder for Composite Stringer Manufacturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In the manufacturing of aircraft composite stringers, inflatable bladders without reinforcement can tear during removal from the composite stringer, leading to manufacturing inconsistencies and increased costs due to resin richness and the need for reworking, as they fail to conform to complex composite structures and apply even pressure.

Innovation Solution

A reinforced bladder with a polymeric material and strategically placed reinforcements, such as fiberglass, that cover only a portion of the cross-sectional shape, providing axial and circumferential reinforcement to prevent tearing and ensure even pressure distribution, allowing the bladder to conform to features like joggles and curvatures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a bladder without reinforcement is used, then the bladder is simple and easy to manufacture, but it tears during removal from composite stringers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidtear resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies reinforcement materials (such as fiberglass mesh or fabric) to specific high-stress areas of the bladder, including the ends and regions that contact composite stringers during removal. This localized reinforcement strengthens the bladder where tearing is most likely to occur while maintaining simplicity in other areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines polymeric bladder material with reinforcement materials (fiberglass, carbon fiber, or other composite materials) to create a composite structure. This composite construction provides both the flexibility needed for conforming to complex shapes and the strength required to prevent tearing during removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If a reinforced bladder is used, then the bladder prevents tearing and maintains reliability, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetear resistanceVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement is applied only where needed - at the ends and high-stress contact areas - rather than uniformly across the entire bladder surface. This selective approach maintains reliability while minimizing added complexity and weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If a bladder is used without strategic reinforcement placement, then the manufacturing process is simple, but pressure distribution is uneven causing manufacturing inconsistencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidpressure distribution uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Reinforcement materials are strategically positioned at the bladder ends and in regions that contact composite stringers during curing. This strategic placement ensures even pressure distribution across the composite structure while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through a straightforward reinforcement application process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10710277B2Reinforced bladder
Publication Date: 2020.07.14 THE BOEING CO
  • US10710277B2 patent drawing
  • US10710277B2 patent drawing
  • US10710277B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for a reinforced bladder are provided. The reinforced bladder comprises a bladder with a cross-sectional shape formed of a polymeric material and a number of reinforcements. Each of the number of reinforcements covers only a portion of the cross-sectional shape such that part of the cross-sectional shape remains uncovered by the number of reinforcements.