Reinforced Connector Receptacles with Metallic Frames

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Connector receptacles in electronic devices are prone to damage from insertion and extraction forces, leading to premature wear and reliability issues, and current manufacturing methods are not optimized for high volume production.

Innovation Solution

The use of reinforced connector receptacles with metallic frames and internal center pieces, along with molded non-conductive materials, to provide structural support and protection against forces during insertion, extraction, and positional stress, while also enabling easy manufacturing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional connector receptacles are used without reinforcement, then manufacturing is simpler and cost is lower, but the receptacles are prone to damage from insertion and extraction forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereceptacle strengthVSAvoidreceptacle structure
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The connector receptacle combines a non-conductive molded body with a metallic frame assembly, creating a composite structure that leverages the advantages of both materials: the molded body provides insulation and basic structure, while the metallic frame provides reinforcement and conductivity. This composite approach resolves the contradiction by achieving high strength through material combination rather than relying solely on complex geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The receptacle is divided into distinct functional components: a molded non-conductive body, a metallic frame, and separate ground contacts. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently for its specific function while being manufactured separately and assembled together, reducing overall complexity while achieving the required strength through the metallic frame reinforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of manufacture

If the tongue is made thin to reduce material usage, then manufacturing cost decreases, but the tongue becomes prone to damage during insertion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidtongue durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The tongue is constructed as a composite structure with a thin non-conductive molded portion providing insulation and a metallic frame portion providing structural strength. This allows the tongue to be made thin for ease of manufacture and cost reduction while the metallic frame ensures durability during insertion and extraction operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The tongue is segmented into a non-conductive molded portion and a metallic frame portion that are separately manufactured and then assembled. This segmentation enables the molded portion to be produced simply and economically while the metallic frame provides the necessary mechanical strength, resolving the contradiction between manufacturing ease and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If reinforcement structures are added to the receptacle, then durability against insertion forces improves, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereceptacle durabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement function is separated into a distinct metallic frame assembly that is manufactured independently and then attached to the molded body. This segmentation allows the reinforcement structure to be optimized for strength without complicating the molding process, as the frame is a separate component that provides durability while maintaining manufacturing efficiency through modular assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The metallic frame serves multiple functions simultaneously: it reinforces the receptacle against insertion forces, provides electrical conductivity for ground contacts, and offers structural support for the tongue. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional separate reinforcement components, thereby improving reliability without proportionally increasing manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If high volume manufacturing is pursued, then productivity increases, but any reduction or simplification in manufacturing becomes significant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing outputVSAvoidmanufacturing process
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The receptacle is segmented into components that can be manufactured using different optimized processes: the molded body through injection molding and the metallic frame through stamping or extrusion. This segmentation enables parallel manufacturing of components and simplifies the overall manufacturing process, making high volume production more efficient and scalable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The composite construction with standardized metallic frame and molded body components enables modular assembly that can be rapidly produced at high volumes. The standardized interfaces and separate manufacturing processes for each material type facilitate automation and scaling, allowing productivity to increase while keeping the manufacturing process manageable through repetition and standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS10862248B2Durable connector receptacles with reinforced tongue and ground contacts
Publication Date: 2020.12.08 APPLE INC
  • US10862248B2 patent drawing
  • US10862248B2 patent drawing
  • US10862248B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Connector receptacles that are able to withstand insertion and other forces, are reliable, and are easy to manufacture. In various examples, the connector receptacle tongue or other portions may be reinforced such that they may withstand the insertion forces exerted through a connector insert.