Reinforced Nail Zone Asphalt Shingle Wind Uplift Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Asphalt roofing shingles face challenges in defining a sufficient nail zone for efficient and secure installation, and in maintaining performance during high wind situations, where the leading edge may lift off due to insufficient nail pull-through value.

Innovation Solution

The roofing shingle design includes a reinforcement member adhered to the lower zone of the headlap portion, with a laminated structure comprising an underlay and overlay member, where the overlay member has a higher height than the underlay, and granules are applied to create a defined nail zone and improve nail pull-through value, while the lack of granules in the lower zones of stacked shingles reduces humping in bundles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a wide nail zone is defined on the shingle surface, then installation efficiency and nail placement latitude are improved, but the shingle structure complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation efficiencyVSAvoidshingle structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by placing a reinforcement member specifically in the nail zone area of the shingle, rather than uniformly across the entire shingle. This reinforcement member has different properties (higher stiffness, granule-free surface) than the rest of the shingle, creating a localized functional zone that improves nail placement while maintaining simplicity elsewhere in the structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the leading edge is reinforced to prevent lift-off in high wind, then wind resistance and reliability are improved, but the shingle weight and material usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewind resistanceVSAvoidshingle weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement member is strategically positioned in the headlap portion where wind uplift forces are most critical, rather than reinforcing the entire shingle. This localized reinforcement provides the necessary wind resistance while minimizing additional weight by concentrating material only where structurally needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The shingle combines different materials with complementary properties: the base asphalt-coated sheet provides flexibility and weather resistance, while the reinforcement member (such as a fibrous or mesh material) provides tensile strength and rigidity in the nail zone. This composite structure achieves superior wind resistance without proportionally increasing weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If granules are applied to the entire shingle surface for protection and aesthetics, then durability and appearance are improved, but humping occurs in stacked bundles

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidbundle uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies granules selectively rather than uniformly across the entire shingle surface. The reinforcement member area remains granule-free or has reduced granule coverage, while other areas receive full granule protection. This localized granule application prevents humping in stacked bundles while maintaining durability and aesthetic appearance in visible areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances the nail pull-through value by up to 112.7% and reduces the weight of shingles by up to 6%, while minimizing humping in stacked bundles by ensuring a uniform height across the bundle, thereby improving installation efficiency and wind resistance.

Implementation Method 1

A reinforcement member is adhered to the lower zone of the headlap portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesive bonding: Adhesive

Implementation Method 2

At least a portion of the asphalt-coated sheet has granules adhered thereto

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Implementation Method 3

the overlay member and the underlay member thereby defining a two layer portion and a single layer portion of the laminated shingle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLamination: Lamination

Data Source

PatentUS8240102B2Shingle with reinforced nail zone and method of manufacturing
Publication Date: 2012.08.14 OWENS CORNING INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL LLC
  • US8240102B2 patent drawing
  • US8240102B2 patent drawing
  • US8240102B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A roofing shingle (74) includes an asphalt-coated sheet (18) having a tab portion (78) normally exposed on a roof and a headlap portion (76) normally covered-up on a roof. The headlap portion has a lower zone (76A) that extends longitudinally between a first end (74A) and a second end (74B) of the roofing shingle adjacent the tab portion, and an upper zone (76B) adjacent the lower zone. At least a portion of the asphalt-coated sheet has granules adhered thereto. A reinforcement member (19) is adhered to the lower zone of the headlap portion.