Reinforced Pickleball Paddle Core for Dwell Time and Spin

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pickleball paddles struggle to maximize 'dwell time' and spin generation while conforming to USAP rigidity specifications, with current materials and designs failing to provide sufficient compression and durability.

Innovation Solution

A pickleball paddle design featuring a core portion with a reinforcing member oriented at non-perpendicular angles, made from fiber-reinforced composite materials, and a sandwich structure with foam and fiber-reinforced layers to enhance compression and spin generation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Duration of action of moving object

If a traditional honeycomb core structure is used, then the paddle meets basic rigidity requirements, but the dwell time and spin generation are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedwell timeVSAvoidrigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The core uses a composite structure combining foam material with fiber-reinforced composite layers arranged in a sandwich configuration. This composite design provides both the compression needed for extended dwell time and the rigidity required to meet USAP specifications, resolving the contradiction between softness for spin and stiffness for structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The fiber-reinforced composite layers are strategically positioned within the core structure to provide localized reinforcement. This allows specific regions to have enhanced compressive properties for spin generation while maintaining overall rigidity, enabling differentiated mechanical properties within different zones of the paddle core.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Force

If the core material is made softer to increase compression, then spin generation improves, but the paddle may exceed rigidity specifications

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecompressionVSAvoidrigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The sandwich structure with foam core and fiber-reinforced composite layers creates a composite material system where the foam provides compression and the fiber layers provide rigidity. This allows the paddle to achieve high compression force for spin generation while the fiber reinforcement prevents excessive deformation, maintaining rigidity within USAP specifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the material parameters by selecting specific foam densities and fiber-reinforced composite configurations. By adjusting these parameters, the core achieves optimal balance between compression capability for spin and rigidity to meet the 0.005-inch deflection limit under 3 kg force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Force

If grit paint or coatings are used on the paddle surface, then spin capability increases, but the coating wears off quickly reducing effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface frictionVSAvoiddurability
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The fiber-reinforced composite layers within the core provide structural integrity and durability that prevents surface degradation. This composite construction creates a more robust paddle body that maintains its spin-generating surface properties over time, addressing the durability issue of traditional grit paint coatings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design increases absorption of impact energy, extends ball contact duration, and imparts greater angular momentum, improving spin and responsiveness without exceeding USAP rigidity limits.

Implementation Method 1

The design increases absorption of impact energy, extends ball contact duration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact energy absorption: Deformation

Implementation Method 2

imparts greater angular momentum, improving spin and responsiveness

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorque: Torque

Implementation Method 3

imparts greater angular momentum, improving spin and responsiveness

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAngular momentum: Angular Momentum

Data Source

PatentUS20260048308A1Pickleball paddle with reinforced core
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 RONBUS CORP
  • US20260048308A1 patent drawing
  • US20260048308A1 patent drawing
  • US20260048308A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A pickleball paddle including a handle portion and a head portion is disclosed. The head portion is operably connected to the handle portion and includes a core portion, a first layer, a second layer, and a reinforcing member. The core portion defines an edge, a first surface, and a second surface. The first layer is disposed adjacent the first surface of the core portion and is made from a first material. The second layer is disposed adjacent the second surface of the core portion, is parallel to the first layer, and is made from the first material. The reinforcing member is disposed within the core portion and is in contact with the first layer and the second layer. A first section of the reinforcing member is oriented at a non-perpendicular angle relative to the first layer.