Reinforced Pressure Vessel Structure for Lower Material Use

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pressure vessels for compressed air energy storage are costly due to the high amount of steel required and generate significant axial and circumferential stresses, leading to high manufacturing costs and material inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A pressure tank design featuring a tubular section with a cylindrical wall and circumferential and axial reinforcement elements, where the cylindrical wall has a lower modulus of elasticity than the reinforcement elements, allowing for reduced thickness and cost, and incorporating sliding connections to mitigate bottoming effects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the diameter of the pressure vessel is increased, then the volume and storage capacity are improved, but the wall thickness must be increased to maintain structural integrity, which increases material consumption and weight

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovevolumeVSAvoidmaterial consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure vessel is divided into a shell and multiple circumferential reinforcing elements (rings) positioned at different locations. This segmentation allows the structure to bear loads more efficiently, enabling larger volumes without proportionally increasing wall thickness and material consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pressure vessel employs a composite structure combining the shell with circumferential reinforcing elements made of different materials (e.g., metal rings, fiber-reinforced plastic rings). This composite approach optimizes strength-to-weight ratio, allowing increased volume without excessive material use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If the wall thickness of the pressure vessel is increased, then the strength and pressure resistance are improved, but the weight and material consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of uniformly increasing wall thickness, the vessel uses discrete circumferential reinforcing elements positioned at critical locations. This segmented approach provides necessary strength at specific stress points without uniformly increasing weight throughout the entire structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Reinforcing elements are placed at specific locations where stress concentrations occur (e.g., near closures, at intermediate positions). This local reinforcement provides necessary strength where needed while minimizing overall weight compared to uniform thickening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If circumferential reinforcing elements are added to the pressure vessel, then the structural strength is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The circumferential reinforcing elements serve multiple functions: they strengthen the vessel structure, reduce required wall thickness, and can be positioned to address multiple stress concentration points. This multi-functionality justifies the added complexity by delivering multiple benefits from a single structural feature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Weight of stationary object

If the wall thickness is reduced to decrease weight, then the weight and material consumption are improved, but the structural strength and pressure resistance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveweightVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of stationary objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The vessel structure is segmented into the shell and separate circumferential reinforcing elements. This allows the shell to be thinner (reducing weight) while the discrete rings provide the necessary structural strength, achieving weight reduction without sacrificing strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The combination of thinner shell material with strategically placed reinforcing elements creates a composite structure that achieves higher strength-to-weight ratio than a uniformly thick wall, enabling weight reduction while maintaining or improving structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentEP3942217B1Pressure vessel with circumferential reinforcing elements
Publication Date: 2026.05.13 IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES
  • EP3942217B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3942217B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~5
  • EP3942217B1 patent drawingFigure 6~8

AI summary

The present invention relates to a pressure vessel comprising a tubular portion and two bottoms (5), the bottoms (5) being arranged at the ends of the tubular portion. The tubular portion comprises a cylindrical wall (1) and a layer of circumferential reinforcing elements (2) wound around the cylindrical wall (1). In addition, the modulus of elasticity of the material of the cylindrical wall (1) is lower than the modulus of elasticity of the material of the first layer of circumferential reinforcing elements (2). The invention also relates to a system for storing and recovering energy comprising a compression means, an expansion means, a heat storage means and a compressed air vessel according to the features described above.