Reinforced Slide Rail Assembly for Adjustable Post Mounting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing slide rail assemblies lack a robust reinforcing structure to effectively support carried objects and adapt to varying distances between posts, leading to potential instability and limited flexibility in mounting configurations.

Innovation Solution

A slide rail assembly comprising a first rail, a second rail, a reinforcing member, and adjustable brackets that can be mounted to posts, with a reinforcing member enhancing structural strength and allowing for longitudinal movement and adjustment to accommodate different post distances, ensuring secure mounting and extended moving distance of carried objects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a simple rail structure is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the structural strength and stability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure complexityVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The rail structure is divided into a first rail and a second rail that can move relative to each other, with the third rail segment movably connecting them. This segmentation allows each rail segment to be simpler in structure while the assembly provides the required strength through their coordinated movement and connection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcing member is attached to a first portion of the first rail and provides reinforcement in a direction perpendicular to the longitudinal movement direction. This adds a dimensional aspect to the strength provision without complicating the primary longitudinal movement function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Stability of the object's composition

If fixed mounting brackets are used, then the stability is improved, but the adaptability to different post distances deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting stabilityVSAvoidadaptability to post distances
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The first bracket is designed to be adjustable along the first rail, transforming from a fixed static mounting solution to a dynamic adjustable one. This allows the bracket position to be changed to accommodate different distances between first and second posts while maintaining stable mounting when positioned.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The first bracket serves multiple functions: it provides stable mounting to the first post, allows adjustment to different positions along the first rail, and accommodates varying distances between posts. This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction between stability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Stability of the object's composition

If the second rail is fixed relative to the first rail, then the structural stability is improved, but the moving distance capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidmoving distance
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The rail system is segmented into multiple movable components (second rail relative to first rail, third rail relative to both) connected through movable connections. This segmentation enables extended moving distance while each connection point maintains structural stability during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The third rail is movably connected between the first rail and the second rail, creating a nested movable structure. This allows the second rail to achieve extended movement distance relative to the first rail through the intermediate third rail, while each connection maintains local structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

4Device complexity

If no reinforcing member is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the supporting strength deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of componentsVSAvoidsupporting strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcing member is attached to a specific first portion of the first rail where additional strength is needed, rather than reinforcing the entire rail structure. This localized reinforcement provides the necessary supporting strength while minimizing the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcing member provides strength in a direction perpendicular to the longitudinal movement direction, adding a dimensional aspect to the support structure. This allows the rail to maintain simplicity in the movement direction while gaining strength in the perpendicular direction through the reinforcing member.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP3094165B1Slide rail assembly
Publication Date: 2018.10.17 KING SLIDE WORKS CO LTD
  • EP3094165B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3094165B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3094165B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A slide rail assembly (22) includes a rail (30) and a reinforcing member (34). The rail (30) includes an upper wall (48a), a lower wall (48b) and a longitudinal wall (50) connected between the upper wall (48a) and the lower wall (48b). The reinforcing member (34) is attached to the rail (30) and includes an upper wall (60a), a lower wall (60b) and a middle wall (62) connected between the upper wall (60a) and the lower wall (60b) of the reinforcing member (34) . The upper wall (60a) and the lower wall (60b) of the reinforcing member (34) correspond to the upper wall (48a) and the lower wall (48b) of the rail (30) respectively. The middle wall (62) of the reinforcing member (34) corresponds to the longitudinal wall (50) of the rail (30).