Reinforced Tool Holder Structure for Precise Cutting Force Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing tool holders are not optimized for cost-effective production while ensuring precise and stable positioning of cutting tools during machining, as they are often made of cheaper materials that fail to withstand cutting forces effectively, leading to tool bending and reduced tool life.

Innovation Solution

A tool holder design with a basic shape reinforced by material accumulations at specific locations to absorb cutting and passive forces, featuring a framework structure that minimizes weight and allows for efficient material usage, with ribs and cavities strategically placed to manage forces during machining.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If tool holders are made solidly to withstand cutting forces, then strength and stability are improved, but weight increases and material costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by reinforcing only specific regions of the tool holder where cutting forces are maximum. The support structure includes selectively positioned ribs and material accumulations at geometric locations subjected to highest loads, while other areas maintain a lighter framework construction. This localized reinforcement achieves the required strength without uniformly increasing the overall weight of the tool holder.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If tool holders are made solidly to withstand cutting forces, then strength and stability are improved, but material costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidmaterial cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by reinforcing only specific regions of the tool holder where cutting forces are maximum. The support structure includes selectively positioned ribs and material accumulations at geometric locations subjected to highest loads, while other areas maintain a lighter framework construction. This localized reinforcement achieves the required strength without uniformly increasing the overall weight of the tool holder.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the tool holder into a framework structure with distinct support regions. The support structure is segmented into multiple ribs positioned at specific geometric locations, allowing material to be concentrated where needed rather than distributed uniformly throughout the entire holder.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Strength

If cutting tools are made of hard metal to withstand cutting forces, then strength is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by reinforcing only specific regions of the tool holder where cutting forces are maximum. The support structure includes selectively positioned ribs and material accumulations at geometric locations subjected to highest loads, while other areas maintain a lighter framework construction. This localized reinforcement achieves the required strength without uniformly increasing the overall weight of the tool holder.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of manufacture

If tool holders use cheaper steel material, then manufacturing cost decreases, but ability to withstand cutting forces deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidstrength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by reinforcing only specific regions of the tool holder where cutting forces are maximum. The support structure includes selectively positioned ribs and material accumulations at geometric locations subjected to highest loads, while other areas maintain a lighter framework construction. This localized reinforcement achieves the required strength without uniformly increasing the overall weight of the tool holder.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies composite materials by combining framework structure with selectively positioned support elements. The tool holder integrates a lightweight framework base material with strategically placed reinforcement ribs and material accumulations, creating a composite structure that achieves high strength-to-weight ratio and optimized force distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentEP4063047A1Tool holder or tool base holder and method for moulding a tool holder or a tool base holder
Publication Date: 2022.09.28 ZCC CUTTING TOOLS EURO
  • EP4063047A1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP4063047A1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2b
  • EP4063047A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for shaping a tool holder (10) or tool base holder (101), and to such a tool holder or tool base holder which, according to the invention, has a basic shape designed to adequately support the cutting tool or the cassette or the tool holder in its resting state, i.e., without being subjected to any machining operation, wherein this basic shape is reinforced by material accumulations only at those geometric locations that are stressed as abutments by forces occurring during machining, namely cutting forces and secondary forces. The invention also relates to a tool holder or tool base holder.