Reinforcement Learning Molecular Docking for Binding Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional molecular docking technologies face challenges with low accuracy in predicting binding strength and high computational resource and time consumption, hindering medical research and drug development.

Innovation Solution

A novel model framework combining a neural network model with a reinforcement learning model is introduced, which acquires feature representations of ligand and receptor molecules to determine additional state information and feedback values, optimizing computational resources and time through a trained Q-learning model.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional molecular docking technology is used to screen ligand molecules, then binding sites can be identified, but computational time and resource consumption are excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinding strength prediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the molecular docking process into two distinct stages: (1) a fast initial screening stage using simplified scoring functions to rapidly evaluate many ligand poses, and (2) a refined accuracy stage using more computationally intensive methods only on promising candidates. This segmentation reduces overall computational time while maintaining binding strength prediction accuracy for the final results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by using simplified approximation methods for the majority of ligand poses during initial screening, reserving full computational accuracy only for a small subset of high-priority candidates. This approach achieves sufficient accuracy for screening purposes while dramatically reducing computational time and resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Measurement precision

If conventional molecular docking technology is used to screen ligand molecules, then binding sites can be identified, but computational resource consumption is excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinding strength prediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides computational resource allocation into segments: low-resource simplified scoring for initial broad screening, and high-resource accurate scoring only for final candidate evaluation. This segmentation maintains binding strength prediction accuracy while optimizing computational resource consumption across the entire screening workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically changes computational parameters such as scoring function complexity, grid resolution, and sampling density based on the screening stage and ligand priority. Early stages use coarser parameters requiring fewer computational resources, while final stages use finer parameters for accurate binding strength prediction, thus resolving the contradiction between accuracy and resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive state information analysis is performed on ligand molecules, then docking accuracy is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocking accuracyVSAvoidcomputational model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the state information analysis into hierarchical levels: basic geometric features (position, orientation) analyzed for all ligands, intermediate features (molecular interactions, energy states) analyzed for promising candidates, and comprehensive detailed analysis reserved for final binding pose evaluation. This segmentation improves docking accuracy progressively while managing computational model complexity at each stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240347143A1Method, electronic device, and computer program product for data processing
Publication Date: 2024.10.17 DELL PROD LP
  • US20240347143A1 patent drawing
  • US20240347143A1 patent drawing
  • US20240347143A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present disclosure provide a method, an electronic device, and a computer program product for data processing. The method may include acquiring a feature representation of state information of a ligand molecule, where the state information comprises at least position information and directional information of the ligand molecule. The method may further include determining, by using a trained reinforcement learning model, additional state information and a feedback value of the ligand molecule based on the feature representation of the state information and a feature representation of state information of a receptor molecule corresponding to the ligand molecule. In addition, the method may further include outputting the additional state information responsive to determining that the feedback value reaches a predetermined threshold. Compared with conventional computer chemistry solutions, the present disclosure can save substantial computational resources and time costs for experimentation, thereby optimizing user experience.