Reinforcement Learning Agent for Drug Compound Identification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for identifying drug compounds for target tissue cells are inadequate due to heterogeneity in clinical responses among patients with different genetic mutations, necessitating personalized treatment approaches that leverage biomolecular data for precision medicine.

Innovation Solution

A reinforcement learning model comprising an agent and a critic, where the critic is a neural network pre-trained to generate property values for compound molecules based on biomolecular data, and the agent generates compound data iteratively optimized using reward values to achieve desired biomolecular actions on target tissue cells.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional drug identification methods are used, then the process is simpler, but the precision and personalization capability for patients with different genetic mutations is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of drug compound identificationVSAvoidcomplexity of identification system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The identification system is segmented into multiple specialized components: an agent neural network for generating compound data, a critic neural network for evaluating property values, and a reward function for guiding optimization. Each component handles a specific aspect of the drug identification process, enabling high precision through specialized processing while managing overall system complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement learning framework acts as an intermediary between the biomolecular data input and the drug compound output. The agent-critic-reward system mediates the complex transformation process, using iterative optimization to bridge the gap between patient-specific biomolecular characteristics and effective drug compound identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If personalized treatment approaches using biomolecular data are implemented, then treatment effectiveness for patients with different genetic mutations improves, but the computational resources and training time required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of treatment outcomeVSAvoidtraining time of reinforcement learning model
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The critic neural network is pre-trained on existing datasets of biomolecular profiles and drug efficacy before being integrated into the reinforcement learning system. This preliminary training allows the critic to quickly evaluate compound property values during the iterative process, reducing the overall training time while maintaining reliable treatment outcome predictions for personalized medicine applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement learning process implements continuous iterative training where the agent generates compound data, the critic evaluates property values, and reward signals guide ongoing optimization. This continuous cycle of generation-evaluation-optimization allows the system to progressively improve treatment reliability while efficiently utilizing computational resources through sustained productive action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Manufacturing precision

If reinforcement learning with iterative optimization is used, then the accuracy of compound data generation improves, but the computational complexity and training iterations required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of compound data generationVSAvoidcomplexity of training process
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The critic neural network provides continuous feedback on the property values of generated compound data, and the reward function translates these evaluations into guidance signals for the agent. This feedback loop enables iterative optimization that progressively improves compound data generation accuracy while managing training complexity through structured evaluation and reward mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11651841B2Drug compound identification for target tissue cells
Publication Date: 2023.05.16 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11651841B2 patent drawing
  • US11651841B2 patent drawing
  • US11651841B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provide a reinforcement learning model including an agent and a critic; the critic includes a neural network pre-trained to generate, from input biomolecular data characterizing tissue cells and input compound data defining a compound molecule, a property value for said biomolecular action of that molecule on those tissue cells. The agent includes a neural network adapted to generate the compound data in dependence on input biomolecular data. Supply biomolecular data characterizing patient tissue cells to the agent and supply that data, and the compound data generated therefrom, to the critic to obtain a property value in an iterative training process in which reward values, dependent on the property values, are used to progressively train the agent to optimize the reward value. After training the agent, supply target biomolecular data, characterizing the target tissue cells, to the agent to generate compound data corresponding to a set of drug compounds.