Systems and methods of depolying reinforcement learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing reinforcement learning algorithms struggle to effectively generalize across different application areas, particularly in telecommunications promotions, due to challenges in transforming raw data into an AI-friendly format and tailoring the algorithmic learning process to the specific task at hand, including issues with feature space discretization and reward signal scarcity.

Innovation Solution

A method is developed to transform customer data into discrete states using dynamic customer latent allocations and incorporate application-specific proxies for the reward function, optimizing the reinforcement learning process to enhance personalized marketing strategies in telecommunications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If continuous features are discretized to enable tabular reinforcement learning methods, then the method becomes more applicable to tabular data formats, but the number of states explodes combinatorially making training unviable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplicability to tabular data formatsVSAvoidnumber of states
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the continuous feature space into discrete bins rather than creating a complete grid of all possible combinations. This selective discretization maintains manageability while capturing essential patterns, avoiding the combinatorial explosion that would occur with full grid discretization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic binning where the discretization parameters adapt based on data characteristics and problem requirements. The bin edges and granularity are adjusted dynamically during the learning process to optimize performance while maintaining feasible state spaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If Deep Q-learning is used to handle continuous features, then the method can process continuous data, but it requires a lot of training data and does not guarantee optimality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to process continuous dataVSAvoidtraining data requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameters of the reinforcement learning approach by using tabular methods with carefully designed discretization rather than deep neural networks. This parameter change reduces the data requirements significantly while maintaining effectiveness for the specific problem domain of telecommunications promotions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a simplified representation (copy) of the continuous state space through discretization into representative bins. This copied, simplified state space can be processed with tabular methods that require less data, capturing the essential dynamics without the computational burden of full continuous space exploration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If reinforcement learning algorithms are applied directly without transformation, then the algorithmic learning process can proceed, but the raw data format is not AI-friendly and requires transformation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning process efficiencyVSAvoiddata transformation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary data transformation and feature engineering before applying the reinforcement learning algorithm. Raw customer data is pre-processed into meaningful features and discretized states that are directly suitable for the RL algorithm, eliminating the need for complex on-the-fly transformations during learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer of processed features and latent representations that bridge the raw data and the reinforcement learning algorithm. This intermediary transformation layer simplifies the data format to be AI-friendly while maintaining the essential information needed for effective learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If generic reinforcement learning algorithms are used without task-specific tailoring, then the algorithm can be applied broadly, but it cannot effectively generalize across different application areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeneral applicabilityVSAvoidgeneralization effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by customizing the discretization schemes, feature selections, and reward formulations to match the specific characteristics of telecommunications promotion data. This localized adaptation ensures reliable generalization within the domain while maintaining the core RL framework's versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes key parameters such as the state discretization bins, action spaces, and reward functions to be specific to the telecommunications domain. These parameter adjustments enable the algorithm to capture domain-specific patterns and generalize effectively across different promotion scenarios within the industry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250259110A1Systems and methods of depolying reinforcement learning
Publication Date: 2025.08.14 BOSTON CONSULTING GRP INC
  • US20250259110A1 patent drawing
  • US20250259110A1 patent drawing
  • US20250259110A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems of using reinforcement learning to optimizing promotions. A promotion can be offered to a user using a reinforcement learning model with a sensitivity parameter, the reinforcement module estimating a time period during which the user will respond to the first information. The user's reaction to the promotion can be observed. The reinforcement learning model can be adapted based on the user's reaction.