Reinforcement Learning for Text Summarization Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional machine learning models, such as Seq2Seq, excel in generating correct outputs at the word level but fail to evaluate and improve the overall quality of generated text, resulting in summaries that may not capture user interest.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that learns an evaluation model using crowdsourcing to assess the favorability of headlines and performs reinforcement learning on a generation model to improve the quality of generated summaries, ensuring they are more engaging and user-friendly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional machine learning models like Seq2Seq are used for text generation, then correct word-level outputs can be obtained, but the overall quality and user appeal of generated text deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveword-level output accuracyVSAvoidoverall text quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation process is segmented into multiple dimensions: word-level correctness evaluation and overall sentence quality evaluation. The system separately evaluates grammatical correctness, factual accuracy, and overall appeal, allowing independent optimization of each aspect without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements multi-dimensional feedback mechanisms where evaluation results from both word-level and sentence-level assessments are fed back to the generation model. This enables the model to learn from both local (word) and global (sentence) evaluation signals, improving overall text quality while maintaining word-level accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If reinforcement learning with multi-dimensional evaluation is implemented, then overall text quality improves, but computational complexity and processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetext generation qualityVSAvoidevaluation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex evaluation task is divided into manageable segments: lexical evaluation for word-level correctness, grammatical evaluation for sentence structure, and appeal evaluation for overall quality. Each segment can be processed independently and in parallel, reducing the computational burden of the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs selective evaluation based on the specific generation task and available resources. Not all evaluation dimensions are applied with equal depth in every case - the system can adjust the intensity and scope of evaluation across different dimensions to balance quality improvement with computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If multiple evaluation dimensions are used for reinforcement learning, then generation model performance improves, but training time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel evaluation accuracyVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Training is segmented into phases where different evaluation dimensions are emphasized at different stages. Early training may focus more on word-level correctness while later stages emphasize overall appeal and grammatical quality, allowing efficient use of computational resources across the training timeline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation system is designed to be multi-functional, where the same evaluation framework serves both training and inference stages. The evaluation model can be used during training for reinforcement learning and during deployment for quality assessment, maximizing resource utilization and reducing overall computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20210357786A1Information processing device, information computing method, and non-transitory computer readable storage medium
Publication Date: 2021.11.18 YAHOO JAPAN CORP
  • US20210357786A1 patent drawing
  • US20210357786A1 patent drawing
  • US20210357786A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus according to the present application includes the generation unit, the evaluation unit and the reinforcement learning unit. The generation unit generates suggestion information from predetermined content using the generation model which generates from content, suggestion information indicating content of the content. The evaluation unit evaluates the suggestion information generated by the generation unit using the evaluation model which has learned which of a plurality of pieces of suggestion information indicating content of the same target content is favorable. The reinforcement learning unit performs reinforcement learning of the generation model on the basis of the evaluation result by the evaluation unit.