Reinforcement Learning for Thin Volume Reduction in CAD

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current techniques for reducing thin volume assemblies in CAD systems lack intelligent decision-making and struggle with high computational overhead, leading to longer modeling times and potential inaccuracies in preserving geometric and topological information.

Innovation Solution

The use of reinforcement learning, specifically a multi-agent reinforcement learning method with supervised learning, to identify thin volumes and generate a structured sequence of operations for reducing thin volume assemblies and generating sheet bodies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional techniques are used to reduce thin volume assemblies, then the reduction process can be performed, but computational overhead is high and modeling time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodeling speedVSAvoidmodeling time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical/geometric rule-based reduction systems with an AI/machine learning system that uses supervised learning predictions and reinforcement learning to automatically determine reduction operations. This substitution enables intelligent decision-making that reduces computational overhead and modeling time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables the CAD software to automatically perform thin volume reduction without requiring manual intervention or complex user configuration. The reinforcement learning agent autonomously identifies thin volumes, selects appropriate reduction operations, and executes them, making the system self-sufficient and significantly improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Device complexity

If traditional reduction methods are used, then thin volumes can be simplified, but geometric and topological information may be lost or inaccurate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel complexityVSAvoidgeometric integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the reinforcement learning agent receives rewards or penalties based on the quality of reduction operations. The system evaluates whether geometric and topological information is preserved accurately, and adjusts its strategy accordingly. This feedback loop ensures that reduction operations maintain manufacturing precision while simplifying model complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts its reduction strategy based on the specific characteristics of each thin volume and its context within the assembly. Rather than applying fixed rules, the reinforcement learning agent adjusts its behavior in real-time to preserve critical geometric and topological information while achieving model simplification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If manual identification and reduction of thin volumes is performed, then geometric integrity can be maintained, but the process is time-consuming and lacks intelligence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric accuracyVSAvoidreduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual identification and reduction processes with an intelligent AI system that uses computer vision and reinforcement learning techniques. This substitution maintains geometric accuracy through sophisticated algorithms while dramatically improving productivity by automating the entire reduction workflow without human intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement learning agent acts as an intermediary between the raw CAD model and the reduced model. It intelligently analyzes the model, determines appropriate reduction operations, and executes them while preserving geometric integrity. This intermediary layer enables both high accuracy and high efficiency by bridging the gap between manual precision and automated speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250165795A1Reduction of thin volume assemblies using reinforcement learning
Publication Date: 2025.05.22 NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA LLC
  • US20250165795A1 patent drawing
  • US20250165795A1 patent drawing
  • US20250165795A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for reducing thin volume assemblies and generating sheet bodies using reinforcement learning is provided. The method comprises establishing respective agents for thin volumes and selecting actions for reducing the thin volumes. The method comprises assigning initial rewards to the actions for each agent. The method comprises executing the selected actions by the agents and assigning rewards to the selected actions based on a reward policy. The method comprises continuing the reinforcement learning until at least one stopping criterion is met.