Relational Robotic Controller for Human-Like Verbal AI

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current computer systems lack the ability to achieve human-like levels of artificial intelligence, as they primarily operate with machine-like intelligence that does not incorporate self-identity and subjective knowledge, failing to replicate human-like verbal and experiential intelligence.

Innovation Solution

The development of a Relational Robotic Controller (RRC) system that programs a robotic self into the system, allowing it to relate, correlate, prioritize, and remember sensory input data, thereby achieving human-like intelligence by simulating human proprioceptive knowledge and experiential intelligence through human-like sensors and a centralized self-location and identification coordinate frame.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If traditional computer systems are used to process information, then computational speed and processing power are improved, but the ability to achieve human-like intelligence and subjective knowledge is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational speedVSAvoidhuman-like intelligence capability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a Relational Robotic Controller (RRC) as an intermediary layer between traditional computer systems and the physical world. The RRC incorporates a robotic self-model that mediates between objective computational processes and subjective experiential knowledge, enabling human-like intelligence while maintaining computational efficiency. The RRC acts as a bridge that translates machine processing into human-like perception and response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical computing approaches with a relational model based system. Instead of relying solely on algorithmic processing, the system uses a robotic self-coordinate frame that models human-like perception, cognition, and action. This substitution enables the system to achieve human-like intelligence by mimicking the relational structures of human experience rather than through brute-force computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If objective data processing is used in computer systems, then computational efficiency is improved, but the development of subjective knowledge and self-identity is prevented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidsubjective knowledge
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a nested structure where the robotic self-model is embedded within the computer system's data processing architecture. The subjective knowledge and self-identity are nested within the objective computational framework, allowing both to coexist. The RRC maintains layers of representation where experiential knowledge is contained within and integrated with computational processes, enabling simultaneous efficiency and subjectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental parameters of data representation in computer systems. Instead of processing only objective data with fixed parameters, the system introduces dynamic parameters that represent subjective experience, self-identity, and relational context. The RRC transforms static data parameters into dynamic, experience-based parameters that evolve through interaction, enabling subjective knowledge development while maintaining computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If machine-like intelligence is programmed into computer systems, then operational reliability is improved, but the ability to perform human-like tasks with experiential understanding is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational reliabilityVSAvoidhuman-like task performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamics into the system by implementing a robotic self-model that adapts and evolves through experience. The RRC transitions from static, pre-programmed machine intelligence to dynamic, experience-based human-like intelligence. The system's parameters, relationships, and knowledge structures are continuously updated through interaction with the environment, enabling flexible human-like task performance while maintaining operational reliability through the structured relational framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9302393B1Intelligent auditory humanoid robot and computerized verbalization system programmed to perform auditory and verbal artificial intelligence processes
Publication Date: 2016.04.05 SHINYMIND LLC
  • US9302393B1 patent drawing
  • US9302393B1 patent drawing
  • US9302393B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosed Auditory RRC-Humanoid Robot equipped with a verbal-phoneme sound generator is a computer-based system programmed to reach high levels of human-like verbal-AI. Behavioral programming techniques are used to reach human-like levels of identification-AI, recognition-AI, and comprehension-AI of all the words and sentences presented to the robot as verbal input signals. An innovative behavioral speech processing methodology is used to recognize and repeat the acoustic sequential set of phoneme signals that comprise the verbally generated speech of human speakers. The recognized and repeated sequential set of phoneme signals are then mapped onto a unique phonetic structure such as all the words and clauses listed in a 50,000 word lexicon that may then make up the vocabulary of the RRC-Robot. The system is programmed to hear and understand verbal speech with its auditory sensors, and intelligently responds by verbally talking with its verbal-phoneme sound generator.