Relay Node Selection Using Communication Frequency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In multi-hop communication systems, existing technologies face challenges in optimizing the selection of relay nodes to minimize communication costs and reduce the number of nodes involved in relaying information, leading to suboptimal communication efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A node with a relay node determiner that prioritizes relay node candidates with higher communication frequencies and more lower nodes, adjusting communication costs using a weighting factor to determine the most efficient relay path, thereby reducing the number of nodes involved in relaying and minimizing communication costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If relay node selection is based solely on smallest communication cost, then communication cost is minimized, but the number of relay nodes involved increases leading to reduced communication efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication costVSAvoidcommunication efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces communication frequency as a new parameter to complement the traditional communication cost parameter. By considering both communication cost and communication frequency (how often a node acts as relay), the system changes the selection criteria from a single parameter to multiple parameters, enabling optimization of both communication cost and communication efficiency simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the communication frequency of relay nodes is monitored and fed back into the relay node selection process. Nodes that frequently serve as relays are identified and prioritized for selection, creating a feedback loop that improves communication efficiency while maintaining cost-effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of energy

If relay node candidates with lower communication cost are selected, then communication cost decreases, but communication frequency and overall system performance are not optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication costVSAvoidcommunication performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds communication frequency as an additional selection parameter alongside communication cost. This multi-parameter approach allows the system to evaluate relay node candidates comprehensively, selecting nodes that offer both cost-effectiveness and proven reliability through their communication frequency performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If any relay node candidate is selected without prioritization, then selection simplicity is maintained, but communication efficiency and cost optimization are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelay node selection simplicityVSAvoidcommunication efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces communication frequency as an automatic selection criterion that works alongside communication cost. This parameter-based prioritization system maintains operational simplicity by using clear, quantifiable metrics while achieving improved communication efficiency through systematic node selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12192874B2Node, communication system, and communication method
Publication Date: 2025.01.07 DAIKIN INDUSTRIES LTD
  • US12192874B2 patent drawing
  • US12192874B2 patent drawing
  • US12192874B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A node performs multi-hop communication. The node includes a relay node determiner that determines a relay node from a plurality of relay node candidates having path information of a path to a master node. The relay node performs relaying. At least when communication frequencies of the relay node candidates are within a predetermined range, the relay node determiner determines the relay node so that a relay node candidate with a higher communication frequency is more likely to be determined as the relay node than a relay node candidate with a lower communication frequency.