Relay State Retention During Processor Reset Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing relay control systems fail to maintain the operation state of a relay when a processor is reset due to system errors, posing a safety risk, especially in environments like electric vehicles exposed to vibrations and temperature variations.

Innovation Solution

A relay control apparatus and method that includes a monitoring unit to detect processor state changes and output decision-control signals, ensuring the relay maintains its operation state through a retain signal even during processor resets, using a configuration independent of the processor.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the processor is reset due to system errors, then the processor can be restored to a normal state, but the relay operation state cannot be maintained and safety risks occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelay operation reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into two independent parts: the processor that handles normal control operations and the monitoring unit that independently monitors processor states and controls relay maintenance. This segmentation allows the relay control function to be preserved independently when the processor resets, resolving the contradiction between reliability and complexity by isolating the critical safety function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring unit acts as an intermediary between the processor and the relay. It monitors the processor's operation state and generates appropriate control signals to maintain relay operation during processor resets. This intermediary component ensures reliability by decoupling the relay control from the processor, preventing the relay state from being lost during processor resets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the relay control depends on the processor, then the control can be updated and managed centrally, but the relay state is lost when the processor resets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelay state maintenanceVSAvoidcontrol system operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring unit continuously monitors the processor's operation state in advance and detects reset conditions before they affect the relay. By performing preliminary monitoring and preparing maintenance signals ahead of time, the system ensures the relay state is preserved without interruption, resolving the contradiction between reliability and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring unit independently performs the function of monitoring processor states and controlling relay maintenance without requiring processor intervention. This self-service capability ensures the relay control system can autonomously maintain its state during processor resets, improving reliability while keeping the operation simple through automatic monitoring and response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If a simple relay control structure is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the system cannot handle processor reset scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol structure complexityVSAvoidsystem error handling
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control structure is segmented into a simple processor unit for normal operations and a dedicated monitoring unit for error handling. This segmentation allows each unit to have a simple, focused function while collectively providing robust error handling capabilities, resolving the contradiction between device complexity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring unit provides beforehand cushioning by continuously monitoring processor health and preparing relay maintenance signals in advance of potential failures. This preparatory monitoring and signal preparation ensures the system can handle processor reset scenarios reliably without requiring complex error handling logic, balancing simplicity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentEP4682927A1Apparatus and method for controlling relay
Publication Date: 2026.01.21 LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD
  • EP4682927A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4682927A1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP4682927A1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A relay control apparatus according to an embodiment of the present disclosure includes a processor configured to output a basic control signal for controlling an operation of a relay; a monitoring unit configured to monitor an operation state of the processor and output a decision-control signal having a differential signal level according to the operation state of the processor and a retain signal for maintaining the operation state of the relay; and a relay state determining unit configured to output one of the basic control signal and the retain signal as a relay control signal for controlling on/off of the relay based on the signal level of the decision-control signal.